Talk:Wales: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
({{subpages}})
 
imported>John Stephenson
(A note on the south)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==The South==
Is it really true, in all cases, to say that the reason that the south is more Anglicised is:
<blockquote>
owing to the extensive exploitation of its natural resources, such as coal and gold, by the English in the 19th century.
</blockquote>
This clearly has something to do with it, but I think it might be a bit simplistic and out-of-date to make such a blanket statement. Surely it also has to do with the economic and linguistic differences? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 20:51, 7 November 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A country of the United Kingdom that historically was considered a principality; population about 3,000,000. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Geography, History and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

The South

Is it really true, in all cases, to say that the reason that the south is more Anglicised is:

owing to the extensive exploitation of its natural resources, such as coal and gold, by the English in the 19th century.

This clearly has something to do with it, but I think it might be a bit simplistic and out-of-date to make such a blanket statement. Surely it also has to do with the economic and linguistic differences? John Stephenson 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wales&oldid=325645"