Talk:Republican Party (United States), history: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gregory J. Kohs (→"Party System" emphasis seems odd: new section) |
imported>Richard Jensen (→"Party System" emphasis seems odd: blend) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why does this article focus so heavily on a construction centering on the "Third Party System", "Fourth Party System", etc.? I studied American History in college (magna cum laude) and graduate school (through C.Phil status), and I never encountered this construction. I'm not saying it's wrong, of course -- just not a familiar way of describing the GOP. No? -- [[User:Gregory J. Kohs|Gregory J. Kohs]] 20:05, 27 February 2008 (CST) | Why does this article focus so heavily on a construction centering on the "Third Party System", "Fourth Party System", etc.? I studied American History in college (magna cum laude) and graduate school (through C.Phil status), and I never encountered this construction. I'm not saying it's wrong, of course -- just not a familiar way of describing the GOP. No? -- [[User:Gregory J. Kohs|Gregory J. Kohs]] 20:05, 27 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::it's a blend of traditional history and political science (where the party system model is used a lot). [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:29, 28 February 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 09:29, 28 February 2008
The article is entirely by CZ editor Richard Jensen, who wrote portions for Wiki as rjensen.Richard Jensen 02:17, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
"Party System" emphasis seems odd
Why does this article focus so heavily on a construction centering on the "Third Party System", "Fourth Party System", etc.? I studied American History in college (magna cum laude) and graduate school (through C.Phil status), and I never encountered this construction. I'm not saying it's wrong, of course -- just not a familiar way of describing the GOP. No? -- Gregory J. Kohs 20:05, 27 February 2008 (CST)
- it's a blend of traditional history and political science (where the party system model is used a lot). Richard Jensen 09:29, 28 February 2008 (CST)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- History Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developed Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History tag