Talk:Social class: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen (not new theory -- just a typo) |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Social Class | |||
| cat1 = Sociology | |||
| cat2 = Anthropology | |||
| cat3 = History | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 3 | |||
| underlinked = n | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]] ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 13:45, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
== Workgroups and links == | == Workgroups and links == | ||
Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT) | Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 12:45, 23 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Sociology Workgroup, Anthropology Workgroup, History Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Joe Quick (Talk) 13:45, 23 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Workgroups and links
Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." Frank W Sweet 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- entire article by CZ editor RJensen, so no need for Wiki reference. Richard Jensen 19:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? Frank W Sweet 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- the links are still there. The best way is to have links on the other pages pointing to Social Class--this article. Richard Jensen 20:50, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
- I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? Frank W Sweet 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
"ly" - typo or acronym?
"Iy was invented in the 1960s": If an acronym, is an explanation in order for a non-expert audience (eg: me), or is this a typo? Wahib Frank 05:48, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
Class and starta: Weberian models
Should this be "Class and strata: Weberian models"? Is this something to do with the Dreifach or three-component theory of stratification or another typo? Wahib Frank 05:52, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
- another typo, not a new theory :) Richard Jensen 13:59, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Sociology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Anthropology Category Check
- History Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Anthropology Advanced Articles
- Anthropology Nonstub Articles
- Anthropology Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Sociology Developed Articles
- Anthropology Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Anthropology Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Sociology Stub Articles
- Anthropology Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Sociology External Articles
- Anthropology External Articles
- History External Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Anthropology Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Anthropology Cleanup
- History Cleanup