Talk:Moore's law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer ("Other considerations" a bit vague; can we get a better header title?) |
imported>Pat Palmer m (Talk:Moore's Law moved to Talk:Moore's law: No reason I can think of why "law" needs to be capitalized.) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 00:36, 9 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 12:28, 22 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Absorb or remove "External Links" and "FAQ" and "Data" sections?
If these are really important to the subject, perhaps they can be used as references. If not, why add them here? Can't people just Google to find the latest links? "External Links" will not usually be maintained by anyone here as they change over time. To illustrate, take a look at the article's table of contents. The entire bottom 1/3 of it is references, notes, external links, faqs, etc. In other words, not topics within the article. To me, that seems to distract from the real topic headers.Pat Palmer 01:31, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
"Other considerations" a bit vague
What's the section really about? Can someone try to choose an explicit header title?Pat Palmer 01:33, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup