Talk:Linguistic anthropology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
imported>Richard J. Senghas
Line 19: Line 19:
==Style==
==Style==
What if we applied [[CZ:CZ4WP#Get_ready_to_rethink_how_to_write_encyclopedia_articles.21]] (and the links that points to) to this? ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:57, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
What if we applied [[CZ:CZ4WP#Get_ready_to_rethink_how_to_write_encyclopedia_articles.21]] (and the links that points to) to this? ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:57, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
::Maybe I'm just tired, but I'm not sure exactly which style issues in those articles you are most concerned about here.  Is one of them voice/register?  If so, I find this prose at a level appropriate for university readers, as called for in the articles you mention. Also, the narrative structure of the article is built sensibly on the chronological trajectory of the discipline, highlighting how it emerged and then can be seen to fall within three discernible paradigms (a useful way of characterizing that history, in my opinion), highlighting the key *kinds* of contributions of the subdiscipline and the names of scholars associated with those concepts.  I think most of the initial wikifying process (links, referencing & typeface conventions) will help make it more readable to those outside the (sub)discipline.  Do you have other particular style concerns that should be addressed before approval?  ---[[User:Richard J. Senghas|Richard J. Senghas]] 00:33, 10 April 2007 (CDT)


==Sources==
==Sources==
I think I got all of the sources.  Feel free to re-adjust the format. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 19:35, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
I think I got all of the sources.  Feel free to re-adjust the format. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 19:35, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:33, 9 April 2007

Media:Example.ogg

Article Checklist for "Linguistic anthropology"
Workgroup category or categories Anthropology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developed article: complete or nearly so
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Richard J. Senghas 13:40, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Original Authorship

Note: The original form of this CZ article has been written by James Wilce, who wrote the version that first appeared on Wikipedia.[1] He has moved the article here to CZ, in its original form ready for further development.


Style

What if we applied CZ:CZ4WP#Get_ready_to_rethink_how_to_write_encyclopedia_articles.21 (and the links that points to) to this? ---Stephen Ewen 14:57, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Maybe I'm just tired, but I'm not sure exactly which style issues in those articles you are most concerned about here. Is one of them voice/register? If so, I find this prose at a level appropriate for university readers, as called for in the articles you mention. Also, the narrative structure of the article is built sensibly on the chronological trajectory of the discipline, highlighting how it emerged and then can be seen to fall within three discernible paradigms (a useful way of characterizing that history, in my opinion), highlighting the key *kinds* of contributions of the subdiscipline and the names of scholars associated with those concepts. I think most of the initial wikifying process (links, referencing & typeface conventions) will help make it more readable to those outside the (sub)discipline. Do you have other particular style concerns that should be addressed before approval? ---Richard J. Senghas 00:33, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Sources

I think I got all of the sources. Feel free to re-adjust the format. --Joe Quick (Talk) 19:35, 9 April 2007 (CDT)