Cochrane Collaboration: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thomas Simmons
imported>Thomas Simmons
Line 10: Line 10:
The Collaboration database is designed to address the overwhelming amount of information that is being produced by clinics and research facilities. At the beginning of the second quarter of 2007, PubMed,<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed]</ref> one of the largest medical sciences databases on Earth, had more than 16 million citations for research journals dating back to the 1950s from 33,360 journals of which more than 7,000 articles were indexed for ‘[[hemochromatosis]]’, 10,790 for ‘[[autism]]’, 47,418 for ‘spinal trauma, 575,965 for ‘virus’, and 1,059,081 for ‘gene’. <ref> PubMed. Retrieved 8 April, 2007</ref>
The Collaboration database is designed to address the overwhelming amount of information that is being produced by clinics and research facilities. At the beginning of the second quarter of 2007, PubMed,<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed]</ref> one of the largest medical sciences databases on Earth, had more than 16 million citations for research journals dating back to the 1950s from 33,360 journals of which more than 7,000 articles were indexed for ‘[[hemochromatosis]]’, 10,790 for ‘[[autism]]’, 47,418 for ‘spinal trauma, 575,965 for ‘virus’, and 1,059,081 for ‘gene’. <ref> PubMed. Retrieved 8 April, 2007</ref>


Reading, evaluating and incorporating best practices from this amount of material is unmanageable.<ref name=HandBook23>[http://www.cochrane.org-resources-handbook-handbook.pdf.webloc Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6]
For the individual health practioner or researcher, reading, evaluating and incorporating best practices from this amount of material is unmanageable.<ref name=HandBook23>[http://www.cochrane.org-resources-handbook-handbook.pdf.webloc Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6]
Updated September 2006, page 23.</ref>
Updated September 2006, page 23.</ref>



Revision as of 10:28, 8 April 2007

The Cohrane Collaboration[1] is an international, non-profit effort to establish a database for reviews in medical intervention to ascertain efficacy of those interventions and promote the search for evidence in clinical trials.[2] Interventions are specifically those measures that health care professionals take to alleviate illness and discomfort. The collaboration is named for the Scottish epidemiologist, Archie Cochrane whose work ultimately initiated the collaboration.[3][4][5] Cochrane’s Rock Carling Lecture,[6] “Effectiveness and Efficiency", given in 1972, is recognised as the initial impetus for the Cochrane Collaboration.[7] In his Rock Carling Lecture, Cochrane delineated the “importance of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in assessing the effectiveness of treatments”. His work subsequently led to the establishment of the Cochrane Collaboration, a global effort locating, assessing and synthesising RCTs in all areas of medicine.[8]

Cochrane’s rationale for this project can be summed up in this excerpt"

"It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organised a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, adapted periodically, of all relevant randomised controlled trials".[9]


Problem and Solution

Problem

The Collaboration database is designed to address the overwhelming amount of information that is being produced by clinics and research facilities. At the beginning of the second quarter of 2007, PubMed,[10] one of the largest medical sciences databases on Earth, had more than 16 million citations for research journals dating back to the 1950s from 33,360 journals of which more than 7,000 articles were indexed for ‘hemochromatosis’, 10,790 for ‘autism’, 47,418 for ‘spinal trauma, 575,965 for ‘virus’, and 1,059,081 for ‘gene’. [11]

For the individual health practioner or researcher, reading, evaluating and incorporating best practices from this amount of material is unmanageable.[12]

Solution

The Collaboration is designed allow the use of systematic reviews of the available research to:

  • efficiently integrate valid information and provide a basis for rational decision making;
  • establish where healthcare is consistent or varies significantly;
  • allow the application of research results across populations, settings, and small differences in treatment;
  • limit bias (systematic errors);
  • reduce chance effects,
  • provide more reliable results upon which to draw conclusions and make decisions;
  • use Meta-analysis to summarise the results of independent studies for more precise estimates of the effects of healthcare (rather than those derived from the individual studies. [12]

The Cochrane Library

The Cochrane Library is a regularly updated database comprised of collections of medically related research (evidence-based medicine), including The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.The Cochrane Library, published quarterly, is available on-line or on CD-ROM by subscription through Wiley InterScience, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and through medical libraries.[13]

Databases

Databases included in The Cochrane Library:[13]

  • The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
  • The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
  • The Cochrane Methodology Register
  • The NHS Economic Evaluation Database
  • Health Technology Assessment Database
  • Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews (CDMR)

References

  1. Cochrane reviews and The Cochrane Library - an introduction The Cochrane Collaboration
  2. What are systematic reviews and protocols? The Cochrane Library
  3. Archie Cochrane Biography Cardiff University]
  4. Self-written obituary British Medical Journal (1988 BMJ 297: 63)
  5. Obituary to Professor Archibald Leman Cochrane MRC News (1988)
  6. The Rock Carling Fellowship Nuffield Trust
  7. The Cochrane Collaboration Archie Cochrane ArchiveCardiff University Cochrane
  8. Effectiveness and Efficiency Book review of Royal Society of Medicine Press
  9. Cochrane A.L. 1931-1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the Year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics, 1979 1-11. Accessed from Archie Cochrane Archives, Cardiff University, 8 April, 2007 The Cohrane Collaboration
  10. [1]
  11. PubMed. Retrieved 8 April, 2007
  12. 12.0 12.1 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 Updated September 2006, page 23.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Cochrane reviews and The Cochrane Library - an introduction The Cochrane Collaboration