Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis (moved from Article page to here) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ::I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at [[telephone newspaper]] (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 23:36, 3 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Engineering Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Bruce M.Tindall |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Approval Area
Russell Potter has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Media Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on May 11, 2007. |
This article is being nominated by an editor using the Individual Editor approval method. --Matt Innis (Talk) 21:10, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Approval?
Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at telephone newspaper (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --Larry Sanger 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Engineering Category Check
- General Category Check
- Media Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Media Advanced Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Engineering Developed Articles
- Media Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Engineering Developing Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Engineering Stub Articles
- Media Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Engineering External Articles
- Media External Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles
- Engineering Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Media Cleanup
- Cleanup
- Media to Approve
- Articles to Approve