Talk:Ann Coulter: Difference between revisions
imported>Louis F. Sander No edit summary |
imported>Louis F. Sander (Add Article Checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Coulter, Ann | |||
| cat1 = Journalism | |||
| cat2 = Literature | |||
| cat3 = Media | |||
| cat_check = | |||
| status = 2 | |||
| underlinked = yes | |||
| cleanup = | |||
| by = [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 19:48, 8 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. [[User:Louis F. Sander|Louis F. Sander]] 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:48, 8 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Journalism Workgroup, Literature Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Please add or review categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Louis F. Sander 19:48, 8 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I imported this from Wikipedia, with the intention of making it into a decent encyclopedia article about a controversial personality. IMHO, the Wikipedia version is a very bad article that places far too much emphasis on negatives, controversies, and the like. Louis F. Sander 22:33, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
I would start over, putting this on (say) Talk:Ann Coulter/WP, picking and choosing what to use. It's a mess right now. --Larry Sanger 23:12, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
Do you mean I should put it in some sort of "work in progress" area, where it can't be readily seen until it's finished? I'm going to work on it, and I already have, but it needs a LOT of work. I've discovered that the work goes fairly slowly, too, especially due to some pretty convoluted and hard-to-get citations. Louis F. Sander 00:39, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
- Journalism Category Check
- General Category Check
- Literature Category Check
- Media Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Journalism Advanced Articles
- Journalism Nonstub Articles
- Journalism Internal Articles
- Literature Advanced Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Media Advanced Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Journalism Developed Articles
- Literature Developed Articles
- Media Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Journalism Developing Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Journalism Stub Articles
- Literature Stub Articles
- Media Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Journalism External Articles
- Literature External Articles
- Media External Articles
- Journalism Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles
- Journalism Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Literature Cleanup
- Media Cleanup