Talk:Heterodox economics movement: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>João Prado Ribeiro Campos
imported>João Prado Ribeiro Campos
Line 22: Line 22:


Also, I assume that "Economic heterodox tradition" is a term of art among economists? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:26, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
Also, I assume that "Economic heterodox tradition" is a term of art among economists? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:26, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
::Point 1> I did not understand what you meant.
::Point 2> Yes, it is. But as everything in Economics, some certainly will not agree...
[[User:João Prado Ribeiro Campos|Guru2001]] 21:49, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:49, 26 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Heterodox economics movement"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup, Sociology Workgroup, Politics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Guru2001 14:49, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





a couple questions

Could the article define what it means by "heterodox"? What are they heterodox in comparison to (was it the same in the early 19th century as it is today)? Also, all of the trends mentioned seem to be various forms of socialism. Would a more specific title perhaps be appropriate?—Nat Krause 17:29, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

==So far yes. Wait for the baritone, teh article is in its very first stages...Guru2001 21:47, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

Links

Can you, João, or anyone else for that matter, please replace all of the external links that are placed in-line in the body of this article with links to CZ articles? I did this with the first instance of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

Also, I assume that "Economic heterodox tradition" is a term of art among economists? --Larry Sanger 19:26, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

Point 1> I did not understand what you meant.
Point 2> Yes, it is. But as everything in Economics, some certainly will not agree...

Guru2001 21:49, 25 March 2007 (CDT)