Talk:Tree (plant): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Tree
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|              orphan = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)
}}
I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera.  They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now.  Thoughts?  [[User:Ian Ramjohn|Ian Ramjohn]] 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)
I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera.  They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now.  Thoughts?  [[User:Ian Ramjohn|Ian Ramjohn]] 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)


Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 10:15, 8 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Tree (plant)"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Not specified
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera. They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now. Thoughts? Ian Ramjohn 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. Nancy Sculerati MD 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)