Horizontal gene transfer in plants

See Horizontal gene transfer and Gene transfer for broader discusions.

See also Transgenic plants for discussion in the context of horizontal gene transfer in plants via pollen, and artificial horizontal gene transfer in biotechnology.

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT), also called lateral gene transfer (LGT) is any process in which an organism transfers genetic material (i.e. DNA) to another cell that is not its cellular offspring, as distinct from vertical gene transfer where genes are inherited from parents or ancestors in a lineage.

Natural gene transfer between plants that do not cross-pollinate

Natural movement of genes between different plant species and from other kindoms (Monera, Fungi) into plants can also of gene transfer mediated by natural agents such as microrganisms, parasites, epiphytes, viruses or mites. Such transfers occur at a frequency that is low compared with the hybridization that occurs during pollination, but can be frequent enough to be a significant factor in genetic change of a chromosome on evolutionary time scales

In the sheep's fescue Festuca ovina, a gene for the enzyme phosphoglucose isomerase appears to have been transferred from the distantly related Poa genus. It has been suggested that such horizontal gene movement of a nuclear gene may follow from a non-standard fertilization with more than one pollen grain, or a direct horizontal gene transfer mediated by a plant virus.

This natural gene movement between species has been widely detected during genetic investigation of various natural mobile genetic elements, such as transposons, and retrotransposons that naturally transfer to new locations in a genome, and often move to new species host over an evolutionary time scale. There are many types of natural mobile DNAs, and they have been detected abundantly in food crops such as rice .

These various mobile or jumping genes play a major role in dynamic changes to chromosomes during evolution , , and have often been given whimsical names, such as Mariner, Hobo, Trans-Siberian Express (Transib), Osmar, Helitron, Sleeping Princess, MITE and MULE, to emphasise their mobile and transient behaviour.

Such genetically mobile DNA contitutute a major fraction of the DNA of many plants, and the natural dynamic changes to crop plant chromosomes caused by this natural transgenic DNA mimics many of the features of plant genetic engineering currently pursued in the laboratory, such as using Transposons as a genetic tool, and molecular cloning. See also Transposon, Retrotransposon, Integron, Provirus, Endogenous retrovirus, Heterosis .

There is large and growing scientific literature about natural transgenic events in plants, such as the creation of shibra millet in Africa, and movement of natural mobile DNAs called MULEs between rice and millet . An article about natural MULE gene movement between rice and millet is worth describing fully:

Jumping genes cross naturally between rice and millet

In the early 1950s, legendary plant geneticist Barbara McClintock found the first evidence that genetic material can jump from one place to another within the genome. The variegated kernels of her maize plants, she determined, resulted from mobile elements that had inserted themselves into pigment-coding genes, changing their expression. McClintock's mobile elements, or transposons, moved over generations within a single species. More recently, another form of genetic mobility has been discovered—genetic information can sometimes be transferred between species, a process called horizontal gene transfer. While horizontal genetic transfer occurs most commonly in bacteria, it has been detected in animals as well. Most transfers between higher animals involve the movement of transposons. Horizontal transfer can also occur between the mitochondrial DNA of different plant species. Until now, however, no one had found evidence for horizontal transfer in the nuclear DNA of plants.

In a new report, Xianmin Diao, Michael Freeling, and Damon Lisch studied the genomes of millet and rice, two distantly related grasses that diverged 30–60 million years ago. While the two grasses show significant genetic divergence from accumulating millions of years of mutations, they carry some transposon-related DNA segments that are surprisingly similar. The authors conclude that these sequences were transferred horizontally between the two plants long after they went their separate ways.

Transposons of the class identified by Diao et al. typically consist of a variable length of DNA that codes for one or more enzymes flanked by repeating sequences called terminal inverted repeats (TIRs). These repeats can bind to each other to form a “lollipop” that is easily excised from the DNA strand, carrying the rest of the transposon along with it. Plant genomes are rife with transposons, many of which are relatively passive. Transposons from the “Mutator” family in maize, however, are especially active, frequently causing mutations as they insert themselves into new positions in the genome. They perform this jump with assistance from the two proteins they code for, a transposase and a helper gene.

DNA from many species of plants contains several families of cousins of the Mutator transposons. These “Mutator-like elements,” or MULEs, code for a protein similar to the transposase, as well as the TIR sequences. Diao et al. identified 19 distinct MULEs in the DNA of various species of millet (genus Setaria), and compared these with the rice genome sequence, which was published in 2002. They compared the sequence similarity of these MULEs to that of other proteins that are also conserved in the same species for which sequences are available. Strikingly, they observed much higher sequence similarity between the MULEs from millet and rice than is typical for transposons. The greater similarity of the MULE DNA is easily explained if it jumped somehow, horizontally, between the species, but there could be alternative explanations. The match could have arisen without horizontal transfer, for example, if the MULE DNA had been under positive selection, as typically happens for protein-coding genes that confer some survival or reproductive benefit. In such cases, natural selection tends to preserve the integrity of these sequences.

To test for signs of selection, the researchers looked at regions of the MULE DNA that don't appear to code for protein. The similarity between these noncoding regions in millet and rice MULEs was just as high as for the coding regions, even though selection probably doesn't influence them. Even within the coding sections, “synonymous” mutations—which don't change the protein sequence and so are not prone to selection—showed few differences between these elements.

Another explanation for the low divergence of the rice and millet MULE sequences could be that they occur within a genomic region that, for whatever reason, experienced lower than average mutation rates. If this were the case, sequences adjacent to the elements should also show reduced variation. The authors tested this alternative hypothesis with the help of maize, which has more genomic sequence available than millet, by comparing genes flanking MULE regions in rice with evolutionarily conserved sequences in maize. The sequences did not show the similar degree of reduced variation predicted for below-average mutation rates.

Since neither selection nor low mutation frequency can explain the similar DNA between the grasses, the authors conclude, a transposon must have carried it between millet and rice long after these species diverged. Interestingly, the authors also found similar sequences in bamboo, raising the question of how common horizontal transfer may be between plant species. Given that plant mitochondrial genes appear “particularly prone to horizontal transfer,” the authors note, “it is remarkable that these results represent the first well-documented case of horizontal transfer of nuclear genes between plants.” But as researchers begin to explore the growing databases of plant genomic sequences, they can determine whether this finding constitutes an anomaly—or points to a significant force in plant genome evolution. —Don Monroe

Citation: (2006) Jumping Genes Cross Plant Species Boundaries. PLoS Biol 4(1): e35 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040035 Published: December 20, 2005

Copyright: © 2005 Public Library of Science. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Epiphytes and parasites as a bridge for gene flow between diverse plant species

Pathways for horizontal gene transfer between plants and parasitic or epiphyte plants that grow on them are now well established.

Epiphytic and parasitic plants are common in the tropical rain forests of New Caledonia in which the flowering shrub Amborella grows. Amborella leaves and stems are often covered with epiphytes, including mosses. Ulfar Bergthorsson and co-workers have suggest that this could readily promote direct, plant-to-plant HGT, and they have implicated and the mitochondria chromosome of Amborella more heavily in horizontal gene transfer than even most free-living bacteria. 20 of its 31 known mitochondrial protein genes from other land plants, mostly from other angiosperms but including six striking cases of transfer from moss donors.

In 2004 it was also discovered that three species of plantains, have a normal functioning copy of the mitochondrial gene (atp1) plus a second defective copy. This second copy resembles the atp1 gene in parasitic dodder plants (genus Cuscuta) that grow on plantains, and deatails analysis indicate dooder to plantain horizontal gene transfer has occurred. Dodders are parasites have no chlorophyll twine around host stems and send in roots to intimitely penetrate their host's cells, enabling DNA to be transferred. .

The converse gene transfer, host plant to parasitic plant has also been detected. In this case the parasites are Rafflesiaceae endophytic plants which lack leaves, stems, and roots, and rely entirely on their host plants for their nutrition. When flowering they producing the largest flowers in the world, which mimic rotting flesh — as an enticement to the flies that pollinate them. .