Robber trench: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Nevell (Created page with "{{subpages}} When the foundations of a stone building a '''robber trench''' is left. The stone may then be reused elsewhere. The trench is then refilled, usually with the materi...") |
imported>Richard Nevell (Link to archaeology) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
When the foundations of a stone building a '''robber trench''' is left. The stone may then be reused elsewhere. The trench is then refilled, usually with the material such as mortar which cannot be reused. For the foundations to have been treated in this manner, the building above must have been removed. Therefore | When the foundations of a stone building a '''robber trench''' is left. The stone may then be reused elsewhere. The trench is then refilled, usually with the material such as mortar which cannot be reused. For the foundations to have been treated in this manner, the building above must have been removed. Therefore this [[archaeology|archaeological]] feature may be the only indication a building existed on a site.<ref>Barker, Philip (1993). ''Techniques of Archaeological Excavation'', third edition. London: Routledge. pp. 34–35. ISBN 0-415-15152-X.</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, 7 February 2013
When the foundations of a stone building a robber trench is left. The stone may then be reused elsewhere. The trench is then refilled, usually with the material such as mortar which cannot be reused. For the foundations to have been treated in this manner, the building above must have been removed. Therefore this archaeological feature may be the only indication a building existed on a site.[1]
References
- ↑ Barker, Philip (1993). Techniques of Archaeological Excavation, third edition. London: Routledge. pp. 34–35. ISBN 0-415-15152-X.