Talk:Partition (mathematics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris No edit summary |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Solution?: interesting) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
I do not know if it is correct, or how important it is, but here's a claim that a problem that has been around since Euler is solved: [http://blogs.plos.org/badphysics/2011/01/20/ono/ Finite formula found for partition numbers]. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 00:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | == Solution? == | ||
I do not know if it is correct, or how important it is, but here's a claim that a problem that has been around since Euler is solved: [http://blogs.plos.org/badphysics/2011/01/20/ono/ Finite formula found for partition numbers]. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 00:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
: If this is true then it certainly is very interesting. A colleague of mine may know more. (Incidently, this page is only sort of disambiguation.) Thank you, Sandy. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:34, 21 January 2011
Solution?
I do not know if it is correct, or how important it is, but here's a claim that a problem that has been around since Euler is solved: Finite formula found for partition numbers. Sandy Harris 00:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- If this is true then it certainly is very interesting. A colleague of mine may know more. (Incidently, this page is only sort of disambiguation.) Thank you, Sandy. --Peter Schmitt 01:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)