Talk:Telephone newspaper/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Nominate for approval?) |
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
||
(16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
==Approval?== | ==Approval?== | ||
Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of [[CZ:Approval_Process]], however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with <nowiki>{ToApprove}}</nowiki> --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of [[CZ:Approval_Process]], however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with <nowiki>[{ToApprove}}</nowiki> --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
::I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at [[telephone newspaper]] (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Since the wiki capitalizes everything (or, I should say, handles things the same either way), I'd prefer to have this article stay as it is. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 13:26, 12 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
::::Well, lower-casing article titles is a common practice on MediaWiki wikis, because it makes it much easier to interlink articles. We do not have to write <nowiki>[[Telephone Newspaper|telephone newspaper]]</nowiki> when linking to an article in passing; we simply write [[telephone newspaper]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::::I'm happy to abide by the general practice; it just feels odd to type the lowercase title, even knowing it will display with a capitalized first word. A hangover from the print era, I'm sure. Thanks also for doing the approval mechanics here -- looks great! [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 17:20, 12 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
== Congrats! == | |||
Congratulations to the Media Workgroup, Thomas H. White, Russell Potter, and everyone else involved. The first approved Media article! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
==APPROVED Version 1.0== | |||
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Telephone_newspaper/Draft&oldid=100100873 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div> |
Latest revision as of 22:12, 13 January 2008
Approval?
Is there some type of system in place where authors nominate articles for approval? I am aware of CZ:Approval_Process, however I don't know that we have enough editors policing the '1' status articles for them to get seen and templated with [{ToApprove}} --Eric M Gearhart 04:43, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- Nice work by the way. Well done. Exactly the kind of article that brought me here in the first place --Eric M Gearhart 06:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
- I hereby nominate the present version of this entry for Approval. I think it's quite robust, well-documented, and well-written; my only thoughts toward improvement would be toward strengthening the very end of the entry, with some discussion of what other media supplanted this endeavor, and giving a more definite sense of the entry's conclusion -- a sort of summing. Other than that, I think it's fabulous! Russell Potter 09:59, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
Is there some reason why this article doesn't live at telephone newspaper (lower case)? It's not a proper name, is it? --Larry Sanger 23:35, 3 May 2007 (CDT)
- Since the wiki capitalizes everything (or, I should say, handles things the same either way), I'd prefer to have this article stay as it is. Russell Potter 13:26, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
- Well, lower-casing article titles is a common practice on MediaWiki wikis, because it makes it much easier to interlink articles. We do not have to write [[Telephone Newspaper|telephone newspaper]] when linking to an article in passing; we simply write telephone newspaper. --Larry Sanger 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'm happy to abide by the general practice; it just feels odd to type the lowercase title, even knowing it will display with a capitalized first word. A hangover from the print era, I'm sure. Thanks also for doing the approval mechanics here -- looks great! Russell Potter 17:20, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
Congrats!
Congratulations to the Media Workgroup, Thomas H. White, Russell Potter, and everyone else involved. The first approved Media article! --Larry Sanger 17:11, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
APPROVED Version 1.0
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Advanced Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles