Talk:Point (geometry): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
imported>Boris Tsirelson
(→‎Error: reply)
 
Line 6: Line 6:


:Right, an amazing error. Maybe he means planes with linearly independent normals?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 08:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
:Right, an amazing error. Maybe he means planes with linearly independent normals?--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 08:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
::This would be a correct formulation. However, is it helpful? The property to have linearly independent normals is not at all simpler than the property to have a single common point. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 11:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:41, 5 April 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition An object that has a position but no length, breadth or depth. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Error

"Any three planes such that no plane is parallel to either of the other two will intersect at a single point" — not at all; take a line and three planes containing this line... Boris Tsirelson 19:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Right, an amazing error. Maybe he means planes with linearly independent normals?--Paul Wormer 08:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
This would be a correct formulation. However, is it helpful? The property to have linearly independent normals is not at all simpler than the property to have a single common point. Boris Tsirelson 11:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)