K3 surface: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Lehavi (basic stub) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
In [[complex geometry]] and in [[algebraic geometry]] '''K3 surfaces''' are the 2-dimensional analog of [[elliptic curves]]. The complex and algebro-geometric definitions are slightly different, and coincide in the case where the surface is an algebraic <math>K3</math> surface over the complex numbers. | |||
[[ | == The algebro-geometric definition == | ||
[[Category: | In algebraic geometry a [[algebraic surface|surface]] <math>S</math> is a <math>K3</math> surface if it is | ||
[[smooth]], [[projective]], with trivial [[canonical bundle]], and such that <math>h^1(O_S)=0</math>. | |||
In this case one automatically gets: <math>h^2(O_S)=1</math>. | |||
=== Examples === | |||
* If <math>C\subset\mathbb{P}^2</math> is a smooth curve of degree <math>6</math> and <math>p:S\to\mathbb{P}^1</math> is the double cover of <math>\mathbb{P}^2</math> branched along <math>C</math>, then <math>S</math> <math>K3</math> surface; indeed in the Picard group of <math>S</math> we have <math>K_S=p^*(K_{\mathbb{P}^2}-\frac{1}{2}[C])=p^*0=0</math>. A similar claim hods even if the curve <math>C</math> is singular; the modification is that now one has to consider the normalization of the branch double cover. Specifically if the curve <math>C</math> is a six lines tangent to a conic, then on recovers for the double cover model of a [[Kummer surfaces|Kummer surface]]. | |||
* A quartic surface in <math>\mathbb{P}^3</math> | |||
* A [[complete intersection]] of a quadric and a cubic hyper-surfaces in <math>\mathbb{P}^4</math> | |||
* A [[complete intersection]] of three quadric hypersurfaces in <math>\mathbb{P}^5</math> | |||
In the last three examples one may verify that the canonical bundle is trivial using [[adjunction formula]] | |||
=== Polarization === | |||
== Complex definition == | |||
In complex geometry a [[complex surface|surface]] is [[complete]] smooth [[simply connected]] surface with trivial canonical class. | |||
=== The Hodge diamond === | |||
=== The period map and the Torelli theorem === | |||
== Complex algebraic K3 surfaces == | |||
=== Moduli ===[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 06:00, 7 September 2024
In complex geometry and in algebraic geometry K3 surfaces are the 2-dimensional analog of elliptic curves. The complex and algebro-geometric definitions are slightly different, and coincide in the case where the surface is an algebraic surface over the complex numbers.
The algebro-geometric definition
In algebraic geometry a surface is a surface if it is smooth, projective, with trivial canonical bundle, and such that . In this case one automatically gets: .
Examples
- If is a smooth curve of degree and is the double cover of branched along , then surface; indeed in the Picard group of we have . A similar claim hods even if the curve is singular; the modification is that now one has to consider the normalization of the branch double cover. Specifically if the curve is a six lines tangent to a conic, then on recovers for the double cover model of a Kummer surface.
- A quartic surface in
- A complete intersection of a quadric and a cubic hyper-surfaces in
- A complete intersection of three quadric hypersurfaces in
In the last three examples one may verify that the canonical bundle is trivial using adjunction formula
Polarization
Complex definition
In complex geometry a surface is complete smooth simply connected surface with trivial canonical class.
The Hodge diamond
The period map and the Torelli theorem
Complex algebraic K3 surfaces
=== Moduli ===