Email greylisting: Difference between revisions
imported>David MacQuigg (stub article) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
'''Greylisting''' involves returning a temporary reject on the theory that only legitimate transmitters will retry after a temporary failure. | '''Greylisting''' involves returning a temporary reject on the theory that only legitimate transmitters will retry after a temporary failure. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
On the other hand, a delay will always give more time for new sources to be blacklisted. | On the other hand, a delay will always give more time for new sources to be blacklisted. | ||
Greylisting may result in loss of legitimate mail if: | |||
a) The transmitter's retry time is not within the minimum and maximum allowed by the greylisting receiver. | |||
b) The retry comes from a different IP address, causing the receiver to not recognize it as a retry. Retry from a different IP is most likely with large organizations that use multiple transmitters.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:00, 11 August 2024
Greylisting involves returning a temporary reject on the theory that only legitimate transmitters will retry after a temporary failure.
Greylisting is controversial as to its long-term effectiveness. If enough spam transmitters add retry capability, greylisting will be like a partially-effective anti-biotic. The pathogen population will mutate to a more resistant form.
On the other hand, a delay will always give more time for new sources to be blacklisted.
Greylisting may result in loss of legitimate mail if:
a) The transmitter's retry time is not within the minimum and maximum allowed by the greylisting receiver.
b) The retry comes from a different IP address, causing the receiver to not recognize it as a retry. Retry from a different IP is most likely with large organizations that use multiple transmitters.