User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Wikis as platforms for OA publishing: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (added some more) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | {{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
== Wikis as platforms for OA publishing == | == Wikis as platforms for OA publishing == | ||
*Open Access by [http://eoearth.org/article/EoE_FAQs#Can_I_use_material_published_in_the_EoE.3F default] (non-open licenses are [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Copyright&id=1 possible]) | *Open Access by [http://eoearth.org/article/EoE_FAQs#Can_I_use_material_published_in_the_EoE.3F default] (non-open licenses are [http://www.scholarpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Copyright&id=1 possible]) | ||
**Fine-grained configurability of [[User:Chris Key/Sandbox/Proposal: Overhaul of user rights#Summary of Rights Given to Each User Group|user rights]], thereby allowing for any peer review model (and any business model). | **Fine-grained configurability of [[User:Chris Key/Sandbox/Proposal: Overhaul of user rights#Summary of Rights Given to Each User Group|user rights]], thereby allowing for any peer review model (and any business model). More details [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_Matrix/user_rights here]. | ||
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikis_in_scholarly_communication#Comparison_between_paper-based_and_wiki-based_scholarly_communication_systems In comparison to paper-based scholarly communication]: | *[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikis_in_scholarly_communication#Comparison_between_paper-based_and_wiki-based_scholarly_communication_systems In comparison to paper-based scholarly communication]: | ||
**Web-native: Basically anything on the web can be [http://test.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Widget_tests#Widget:SlideShare embedded] or otherwise directly linked to | **Web-native: Basically anything on the web can be [http://test.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Widget_tests#Widget:SlideShare embedded] or otherwise directly linked to | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
*The more open research becomes, the [http://ways.org/files/Open_Science_Adapting_the_research_cycle_animated-small.gif more diverse] will the acts of science publishing become. Wikis exist for [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|all aspects of the research cycle]] (except for funding decisions, though the reasons are not of a technical nature) | *The more open research becomes, the [http://ways.org/files/Open_Science_Adapting_the_research_cycle_animated-small.gif more diverse] will the acts of science publishing become. Wikis exist for [[User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/LSWT 2010/Integrating wikis with scientific workflows|all aspects of the research cycle]] (except for funding decisions, though the reasons are not of a technical nature) | ||
*Wikis stress the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for [[Chordoma|images]]) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. [http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/item/toc.html detailed discussion] with respect to the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society], [http://arxiv.org/ arxiv] and [http://www.quantiki.org/ Quantiki], and the [http://rmp.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.101.140001 final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works]). While the main purpose of such licensing is certainly to make the research available to other specialists working in the field, they also make the research available to scientists from other fields (not just in academia) as well as non-scientists (teachers, entrepreneurs, media, patient groups or hobbyists). | *Wikis stress the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for [[Chordoma|images]]) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. [http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/jono/item/toc.html detailed discussion] with respect to the [http://www.aps.org/ American Physical Society], [http://arxiv.org/ arxiv] and [http://www.quantiki.org/ Quantiki], and the [http://rmp.aps.org/edannounce/PhysRevLett.101.140001 final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works]). While the main purpose of such licensing is certainly to make the research available to other specialists working in the field, they also make the research available to scientists from other fields (not just in academia) as well as non-scientists (teachers, entrepreneurs, media, patient groups or hobbyists). | ||
**Examples: [[Gyrification]], [[Surface-based morphometry]] and [[Chordoma]] | |||
**Also note that [http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.025.2009 Fig. 3 of http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.025.2009] and [http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00020 Fig. 2(III) of http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00020] explain the same thing, original to neither papers; a collaborative version might have been better | |||
**Direct re-use by way of iframes: [http://reusableoer.blogspot.com/2010/08/wikieducator-remix.html demo] | **Direct re-use by way of iframes: [http://reusableoer.blogspot.com/2010/08/wikieducator-remix.html demo] | ||
**Incompatibility of wikis and closed-access publishing — [http://friendfeed.com/auditory-motor-coupling/2d9a52d1/reuse-of-images-from-wikipedia-in-copyrighted re-use of CC-BY-SA content in copyrighted papers] | |||
**Incompatibility of wikis and closed-access publishing | |||
Latest revision as of 03:41, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo
Wikis as platforms for OA publishing
- Open Access by default (non-open licenses are possible)
- Fine-grained configurability of user rights, thereby allowing for any peer review model (and any business model). More details here.
- In comparison to paper-based scholarly communication:
- Web-native: Basically anything on the web can be embedded or otherwise directly linked to
- Contextual links are the central pillar
- Version control built in (along with time stamps, naturally), thus allowing stable releases and updatability, while establishing priority
- Several popular wikis are open source and have been tested under high load
- built-in article-level metrics at bottom of page and via What links here (which could also be used for other pages, e.g. those hosting images, references, or datasets), author-level metrics via Special:Contributions, further aggregation possible (e.g. at the level of research projects, labs or thematic workgroups)
- The more open research becomes, the more diverse will the acts of science publishing become. Wikis exist for all aspects of the research cycle (except for funding decisions, though the reasons are not of a technical nature)
- Wikis stress the re-use part of CC licenses (e.g. for images) — an aspect of OA publishing that does not receive much attention outside research blogs (cf. detailed discussion with respect to the American Physical Society, arxiv and Quantiki, and the final outcome: APS authors keep copyright over derivative works). While the main purpose of such licensing is certainly to make the research available to other specialists working in the field, they also make the research available to scientists from other fields (not just in academia) as well as non-scientists (teachers, entrepreneurs, media, patient groups or hobbyists).
- Examples: Gyrification, Surface-based morphometry and Chordoma
- Also note that Fig. 3 of http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.025.2009 and Fig. 2(III) of http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00020 explain the same thing, original to neither papers; a collaborative version might have been better
- Direct re-use by way of iframes: demo
- Incompatibility of wikis and closed-access publishing — re-use of CC-BY-SA content in copyrighted papers