Entanglement (physics)/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Boris Tsirelson
imported>Boris Tsirelson
(→‎Historic: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Historic==
==Historic==
{{Citation
| last1 = Einstein
| first1 = Albert
| last2 = Podolsky
| first2 = Boris
| last3 = Rosen
| first3 = Nathan
| year = 1935
| title = Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
| journal = Physical Review
| volume = 47
| number =
| pages = 777–780
| url =
}}.


{{Citation
{{Citation

Revision as of 14:38, 25 September 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Entanglement (physics).
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.

Historic

Einstein, Albert; Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen (1935), "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?", Physical Review 47: 777–780.

Bell, J. S. (1964), "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox", Physics 1 (3): 195–200 (available also here).

Non-technical

Mermin, N. David (1985), "Is the Moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory", Physics Today 38 (4): 38–47 (available also here and elsewhere).

Bell, John; A. Shimony & M. Horne et al. (1985), "An exchange on local beables", Dialectica 39 (2): 85–110.

Technical

Buhrman, Harry; Richard Cleve & Serge Massar et al. (2010), "Nonlocality and communication complexity", Reviews of Modern Physics 82 (1): 665–698 (also arXiv).