User talk:Peter Schmitt/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→You've won the lottery for an invitation !!!: overdone?) |
imported>Milton Beychok |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Peter, you just won the opportunity to take a look at the new [[Volatility (chemistry)]] article and apply your proof reading skills as well as your skill at writing comments on the article's Talk page. It also gives you the opportunity to tear yourself away from the forums. Enjoy !!! [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | Peter, you just won the opportunity to take a look at the new [[Volatility (chemistry)]] article and apply your proof reading skills as well as your skill at writing comments on the article's Talk page. It also gives you the opportunity to tear yourself away from the forums. Enjoy !!! [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 16:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
: It is only a matter of style, but for my taste the "For more information see" is overdone: The same terms are linked just below them, and they are also listed as "Related articles. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 22:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | : It is only a matter of style, but for my taste the "For more information see" is overdone: The same terms are linked just below them, and they are also listed as "Related articles. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 22:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks, Peter, for all the items you picked up ... I knew i could count on you. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 00:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:19, 22 September 2010
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Where Peter lives it is approximately: 14:40
| < | 2009(May19-Dec31) / 2010(Jan01-Aug28) / Sep 2010--2011 |
|---|
You've won the lottery for an invitation !!!
Peter, you just won the opportunity to take a look at the new Volatility (chemistry) article and apply your proof reading skills as well as your skill at writing comments on the article's Talk page. It also gives you the opportunity to tear yourself away from the forums. Enjoy !!! Milton Beychok 16:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is only a matter of style, but for my taste the "For more information see" is overdone: The same terms are linked just below them, and they are also listed as "Related articles. --Peter Schmitt 22:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Peter, for all the items you picked up ... I knew i could count on you. Milton Beychok 00:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)