Talk:Modular form: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Don't understand: More dialogue about rôle) |
imported>Milton Beychok m (→Don't understand: More dialogue about correct American Rnglish) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Because it is (a) correct (spelling). ''':-)''' --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | : Because it is (a) correct (spelling). ''':-)''' --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 01:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I grant you that it is "''a''" correct spelling ... but it is more French than the more common English word, n'est-il pas ? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | ::I grant you that it is "''a''" correct spelling ... but it is more French than the more common English word, n'est-il pas ? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I myself feel that to use "rôle" in today's English is pedantic, pretentious, affected, and essentially incorrect. I '''thought''' that maybe ''The New Yorker'' might use it (they still use ö in coördinate, for instance) but I just found a recent ''New Yorker'' issue online and they too are spelling it "role". I myself '''might''' write something like, "Marlon Brando played the rôle of Mr. Christian in ''Mutiny on the Bounty'', but in my own life Christianity plays no role at all." But I doubt it. Milt, I were you, I would change it back. And if Peter reverts '''that''', then you could file a formal "Request for Decision" to the EC -- it would give us sometime '''important''' to consider, hehe.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::Hayford, I agree with you completely and hopefully the author of this article, [[User:Josy Shewell Brockway|Josy Shewell Brockway ]], will do the right thing and change it. I don't want to start a revert war with Peter or anyone else ... but thanks for your erudite support. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 17:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 16 December 2010
Don't understand
Josy, why "... played a key rôle in" .... instead of "... played a key role in ..." ?? Milton Beychok 00:54, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Because it is (a) correct (spelling). :-) --Peter Schmitt 01:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- I grant you that it is "a" correct spelling ... but it is more French than the more common English word, n'est-il pas ? Milton Beychok 05:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- I myself feel that to use "rôle" in today's English is pedantic, pretentious, affected, and essentially incorrect. I thought that maybe The New Yorker might use it (they still use ö in coördinate, for instance) but I just found a recent New Yorker issue online and they too are spelling it "role". I myself might write something like, "Marlon Brando played the rôle of Mr. Christian in Mutiny on the Bounty, but in my own life Christianity plays no role at all." But I doubt it. Milt, I were you, I would change it back. And if Peter reverts that, then you could file a formal "Request for Decision" to the EC -- it would give us sometime important to consider, hehe.... Hayford Peirce 16:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hayford, I agree with you completely and hopefully the author of this article, Josy Shewell Brockway , will do the right thing and change it. I don't want to start a revert war with Peter or anyone else ... but thanks for your erudite support. Milton Beychok 17:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)