Talk:Term of art: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Hayford Peirce
(niggling and naggling)
Line 3: Line 3:


:Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
::Nag, nag, nag, that's all he does! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 20:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:32, 14 March 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A common word or phrase, as opposed to jargon, which has a precisely defined meaning in a specific context [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Law and Linguistics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Howard, great idea for a page. Did I spur you into this one? David E. Volk 20:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Nahhh...it was Hayford complaining about my using the phrase "term of art". Now that you mention it, though, it does tie into such things as "semi-automatic". While I commented on the Forum, I think the compromise there is to disambiguate. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Nag, nag, nag, that's all he does! Hayford Peirce 20:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)