User:Nick Gardner/Public debt/Tutorials: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
(transferred to fiscal policy)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Implications of the debt trap identity==
===The identity===
According to the debt trap identity, the annual increase in public debt as a percentage of GDP is given by:
:::::: Δd  =  f + d(r - g)
where d is public debt as a percentage of GDP<br> and f is the primary budget deficit (shown with a negative negative sign if a surplus)  as a percentage of GDP,<br> and r is the interest rate payable on government debt.
:''(for proof of the identity, see paragraph 2 of the addendum subpage[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/National_Debt/Addendum])''
===Sustainability===
A necessary  condition for long-term sustainability is that Δd does not consistently  exceed zero - since otherwise the interest due  would  eventually amount to a greater percentage of GDP than could conceivably be financed from taxation. The dept trap,  implies, therefore,  that <br>
-&nbsp; &nbsp;if the interest rate is greater than the growth rate, sustainability requires an average  budget surplus ratio equal to at least d(r-g) and <br>
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;if the growth rate exceeds the interest rate, it requires that the budget deficit ratio does not on average exceed d(g-r).
However, the identity embodies the implicit assumptions  that deficits earn no return, and that they do not affect  growth rates or interest rates.
Since many diferent combinations of r, g are possible the debt trap identity does not define a unique relation between the the debt/gdp ratio, d and the minimum value of surplus/gdp (or maximum value of the deficit/gdp) ratio, f that is necessary for sustainability, even under the assumptions that have been implicitly adopted.
Some light can nevertheless be thrown on the issues by inserting some typical values for r and g and by qualifying the implicit assumptions.
Interest rates on government bonds are usually greater than gdp growth rates, so an average budget surplus will usually be required  for sustainability. <br> If, for example, r were 5% and g were 2% then - on the original assumptions -  a debt of 50% of gdp would require an average surplus of 1.5% of gdp a debt of 100% of gdp would require an average  surplus of 3% of gdp,  and so forth.
The first qualification to those conclusions is that a deficit devoted  exclusively to  investments having  positive net present values in financial terms would eventually, by definition, be  self-financing and would therefore not require a surplus for sustainability. That means that the debt trap applies only to that part of the debt that is undertaken for other reasons. This qualification is important because failure to take up successful investment opportunities  in order to reduce the national debt imposes an opportunity cost on future generations.
The second qualification concerns the possibility the growth rate, g, could be influenced by  a deficit. At times of impending recession any avoidance of a drop in growth that could be achieved by a deficit would at least partially offset the increase in surplus that would subsequently be necessary for sustainability. (It could conceivably even reduce the required surplus. If, for example, an increase in the debt ratio from 50% to  100% averted the replacement of a 2% growth rate by a 2% rate of decline and the interest rate remained at 5%, it would reduce the required surplus from 3.5% to 3%.)
A third qualification is that r may not be independent of d.  The size of the public debt may influence the interest rate that would have to be paid on it. That can happen if operators in the market for government bonds believe that there is an increased probability of default, in which case they will require a risk premium in addition to the rate of return that they would otherwise require. The size of the premium is indicated by the country's ''sovereign spread''.
Lastly, it may be necessary to take account of expectations, both rational and irrational. A rationally-formed expectation of a reduction in g may increase the market value of r because of its effect upon default risk. More importantly,  a rumour of increased default risk may be self-fulfilling because of ''herding'' behaviour in the bond market.
==International comparisons==
:( % of GDP )
:::{|class = "wikitable"
|
|align="center"|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Japan&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
|align="center"|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Italy&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
|align="center"|&nbsp;&nbsp; France&nbsp;&nbsp;
|align="center"|&nbsp;&nbsp; Germany &nbsp;&nbsp;
|align="center"| United States
|align="center"| United Kingdom
|align="center"| &nbsp;&nbsp;China&nbsp;&nbsp;
|align="center"| Australia
|-
|2007
|align="center"|195
|align="center"|107
|align="center"|65
|align="center"|65
|align="center"|62
|align="center"|44
|align="center"|20
|align="center"|9
|-
|2014 est
|align="center"|222
|align="center"|118
|align="center"|79
|align="center"|77
|align="center"|100
|align="center"|76
|align="center"|19
|align="center"|4
|}
::''(Source: IMF [http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2009/030609.pdf])''
==References==
<references/>

Revision as of 02:31, 22 October 2009

This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Nick_Gardner/Public_debt/Tutorials&oldid=595917"