Talk:Standartenfuhrer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Accessibility versus orthographic correctness. Redirects?)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Umlaut? ==
Why don't we move this article to Standartenführer? (and the other articles, as well)
It's technically feasible and it would be more correct, orthographically, and it would be in line with our [[CZ:Romanization|Romanization]] policy...
It's not a big deal either way, though. [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 22:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:I don't mind it as a redirect, but I have deliberately been using a more Anglicized format given that my experience is that the average user, who does not read German, will not know the forms with either the diacritic or dipthong. A very large amount of military history, and I include professional military but not necessarily academic presses, is not orthographically correct. The might not know a Standartenführer from a mad dog...hmmmm....[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:49, 18 February 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A Nazi SS rank roughly equal to colonel [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Military [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Umlaut?

Why don't we move this article to Standartenführer? (and the other articles, as well)

It's technically feasible and it would be more correct, orthographically, and it would be in line with our Romanization policy...

It's not a big deal either way, though. Brian P. Long 22:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't mind it as a redirect, but I have deliberately been using a more Anglicized format given that my experience is that the average user, who does not read German, will not know the forms with either the diacritic or dipthong. A very large amount of military history, and I include professional military but not necessarily academic presses, is not orthographically correct. The might not know a Standartenführer from a mad dog...hmmmm....Howard C. Berkowitz 22:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)