Recovered memory/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Neil Brick (create) |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*{{cite book |last= Brown, Scheflin and Hammond |title=Memory, Trauma Treatment, And the Law |year= 1998 |publisher= W. W. Norton |location= New York, NY |isbn= 0-393-70254-5}} | *{{cite book |last= Brown, Scheflin and Hammond |title=Memory, Trauma Treatment, And the Law |year= 1998 |publisher= W. W. Norton |location= New York, NY |isbn= 0-393-70254-5}} | ||
*{{Cite book | last = Schacter | first= D.L. |co-author=Scarry, E. |date=2000 |title=Memory, brain and belief | publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, MA}} | *{{Cite book | last = Schacter | first= D.L. |co-author=Scarry, E. |date=2000 |title=Memory, brain and belief | publisher=Harvard University Press |location=Cambridge, MA}} | ||
2092-8. | |||
*Geraerts E ''et al.''2009 Cognitive mechanisms underlying recovered-memory experiences of childhood sexual abuse. ''Psychol Sci.'' 20:92-8. PMID: 19037903 | |||
''(People sometimes report recovering long-forgotten memories of childhood sexual abuse. The memory mechanisms that lead to such reports are not well understood, and the authenticity of recovered memories has often been challenged. We identified two subgroups of people reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. These subgroups differed dramatically in their cognitive profiles: People who recovered memories of abuse through suggestive therapy exhibited a heightened susceptibility to the construction of false memories, but showed no tendency to underestimate their prior remembering. Conversely, people who recovered memories of abuse spontaneously showed a heightened proneness to forget prior incidences of remembering, but exhibited no increased susceptibility to false memories. This double dissociation points to mechanisms that underlie recovered-memory experiences and indicates that recovered memories may at times be fictitious and may at other times be authentic.)'' | |||
Revision as of 04:39, 16 March 2009
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- Brown, Scheflin and Hammond (1998). Memory, Trauma Treatment, And the Law. New York, NY: W. W. Norton. ISBN 0-393-70254-5.
- Schacter, D.L. (2000). Memory, brain and belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2092-8.
- Geraerts E et al.2009 Cognitive mechanisms underlying recovered-memory experiences of childhood sexual abuse. Psychol Sci. 20:92-8. PMID: 19037903
(People sometimes report recovering long-forgotten memories of childhood sexual abuse. The memory mechanisms that lead to such reports are not well understood, and the authenticity of recovered memories has often been challenged. We identified two subgroups of people reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. These subgroups differed dramatically in their cognitive profiles: People who recovered memories of abuse through suggestive therapy exhibited a heightened susceptibility to the construction of false memories, but showed no tendency to underestimate their prior remembering. Conversely, people who recovered memories of abuse spontaneously showed a heightened proneness to forget prior incidences of remembering, but exhibited no increased susceptibility to false memories. This double dissociation points to mechanisms that underlie recovered-memory experiences and indicates that recovered memories may at times be fictitious and may at other times be authentic.)