User talk:Jed Rothwell: Difference between revisions
imported>Jed Rothwell |
imported>Chris Day |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::- Jed | ::- Jed | ||
::Yes, [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cold_Fusion&diff=100386408&oldid=100386407 it is does reflect that change] but you seem to be critising your own work, or is it just that your original version still needs work? The latter one is [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cold_Fusion&diff=100386410&oldid=100386408 an odd comment]. Who is distorting the claims of researchers? the implication is it someone else but that is text you wrote? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 17:12, 15 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:12, 15 September 2008
Welcome!
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Larry Sanger 18:26, 13 September 2008 (CDT)
correcting your own text
Jed, your last two edit summaries:
- "It isn't "just" by creating -- creating is very difficult."
- "Let us get the products right. Do not distort the claims made by researchers. It isn't "ordinary" helium; it is unexpected"
In both instances you are making changes to parts of the text that are unchanged from the original version you uploaded here. I find this very confusing, have you changed you opinion since uploading it here? I'm guessing not, was this from wikipedia and you brought the wrong version? Chris Day 16:32, 15 September 2008 (CDT)
- I don't know why. Sorry. Not an experienced Wiki user. The former was supposed to remark this change:
- . . . highly loaded palladium deuteride. That is, palladium which has absorbed nearly as many atoms of deuterium as the number of palladium atoms in the sample. This material is extremely difficult to produce.
- - Jed
- Yes, it is does reflect that change but you seem to be critising your own work, or is it just that your original version still needs work? The latter one is an odd comment. Who is distorting the claims of researchers? the implication is it someone else but that is text you wrote? Chris Day 17:12, 15 September 2008 (CDT)