Talk:English irregular verbs: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe
(New page: I am beginning to think that the example words are better unbolded, as the accents are enough to mark them out, and the bolding clashes with that of the articles' names. ~~~~)
 
imported>David E. Volk
m (subpages)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
I am beginning to think that the example words are better unbolded, as the accents are enough to mark them out, and the bolding clashes with that of the articles' names. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:43, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
I am beginning to think that the example words are better unbolded, as the accents are enough to mark them out, and the bolding clashes with that of the articles' names. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 17:43, 31 March 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:56, 26 April 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition English language verbs whose past and past participle tense forms do not follow the standard rules of add –d or -ed to the end but instead have special forms. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Linguistics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I am beginning to think that the example words are better unbolded, as the accents are enough to mark them out, and the bolding clashes with that of the articles' names. Ro Thorpe 17:43, 31 March 2008 (CDT)