Talk:Fossilization (language acquisition): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(subpages)
 
imported>John Stephenson
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Simple hypothesis ==
Perhaps the simplest explanation for fossilisation is that once the learner can achieve his/her communicative goals in the L2, there is little reason either for him/her to learn more or for others to provide correction and feedback. I'd say the article should at least mention this hypothesis. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
:The phenomenon really refers to a freeze in progress regardless of what the learner does or doesn't do, and consequent resistance to explicit or implicit correction, as opposed to learners not developing fluency simply because they no longer need to learn more, i.e. it's some sort of psycholinguistic or cognitive effect rather than a consequence of low exposure or need to use the language. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 15:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:41, 7 May 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition loss of progress in second language acquisition, where learners no longer move towards native-like ability in the second language, often despite constant exposure to it. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Linguistics [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Language Acquisition
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Simple hypothesis

Perhaps the simplest explanation for fossilisation is that once the learner can achieve his/her communicative goals in the L2, there is little reason either for him/her to learn more or for others to provide correction and feedback. I'd say the article should at least mention this hypothesis. Sandy Harris 01:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

The phenomenon really refers to a freeze in progress regardless of what the learner does or doesn't do, and consequent resistance to explicit or implicit correction, as opposed to learners not developing fluency simply because they no longer need to learn more, i.e. it's some sort of psycholinguistic or cognitive effect rather than a consequence of low exposure or need to use the language. John Stephenson 15:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)