Talk:Google (company)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anton Sweeney
(→‎China controversy: new section)
imported>John Stephenson
m (John Stephenson moved page Talk:Alphabet Inc./Archive 1 to Talk:Google (company)/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: got the name wrong...)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{archive box}}


It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. [[User:Vipul Naik|Vipul Naik]] 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)
It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. [[User:Vipul Naik|Vipul Naik]] 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 06:33, 29 October 2021


It seems that the article on Google has too large a criticism section relative to the fact that there's absolutely nothing else in the article. While a criticisms section should be there, in my view, its language needs to be changed. Also, casual readers may get an incorrect impression of the Citizendium on seeing this kind of article about Google. Vipul Naik 19:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

China controversy

Hasn't Google pulled out of China? This section probably needs to be updated. Anton Sweeney 20:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)