Orchid: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dalton Holland Baptista
(Adding something about their taxonomy)
imported>Dalton Holland Baptista
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:


==Distribution==
==Distribution==
Despite their distribution is largely irregular throughout the globe, orchids can be found in almost all regions of the planet, except Antartic continet. Due to their wide greographic distribution, it is natural that a so diverse group of plants show high degree of adaptation to different climates and to the multiplicity of polinators present in each area.<ref name="D1"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Dressler, Robert L.</span> (1981). The Orchids: Natural History and Classification. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674875257.</ref> Orchidaceae is a family passing through an active cycle of evoluctionary development. Traditionaly, Biology considers the species concept as a group of beings that can breed producing fertile descendants. Orchid species are slightly different because they do not fit well in this concept. Not only most of the species can interbreed with several other producing fertile descendants, as most of the genera that belong to the same subtribe can do too.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">de Queiroz, K.</span> (2005). Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. volume 102 Suppl.1 pp. 6600–7  [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15851674 pmid=15851674]</ref>  It is not uncommon to encounter natural hybrids between diferent species and genera in the wild, and although almost all these plants are fertile, the are not more common just because as orchids are highly adaptated to their polinator, these hybrids may occur by chance and their particular resulting morphology are not really adaptated to the existing polinators. There are some rare exceptions, when these hybrids are result of breedings of two closely related species and still can be polinated by the same polinators of parent species. When this happens it is more likely that along the years a new species can appear. This may be the case of ''[[Cattleya × mesquitae]]''. It is a natural hybrid discovered  in 1996 in Goiás State in [[Brazil]]. We know know that this species is a result of a high degree of interbreeding of ''[[Cattleya walkeriana]]'' and ''[[Cattleya nobilior]]''. As the result of this breeding is pollinated by the same agents of its parents, the crossing has been occuring again and again between the three species from the area along the ages, thus one of the original parents cannot be found there anymore. All original plants have crossed and faded. Today we know ''[[Cattleya × mesquitae]]'' is a hybrid because similar plants have been procuced by artificial breedings. Lou Menezes, its describer, claims that this species is so ancient that they have even evolved in nature, developing a fragrance that is not present on the hybrids artificially produced.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Menezes, Lou. C.</span> ''Cattleya × mesquitae'' in Boletim CAOB vol.26 p.24. São Paulo, 1996.</ref> This is one of the ways a new species can appear in ithe wild. Cases like this are not uncommon among orchids, therefore many species are hard to circunscribe exactly because they result of different degrees of breedings between closely related species in a given area.
Despite their distribution is largely irregular throughout the globe, orchids can be found in almost all regions of the planet, except Antartic continet. Due to their wide greographic distribution, it is natural that a so diverse group of plants show high degree of adaptation to different climates and to the multiplicity of polinators present in each area.<ref name="D1"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Dressler, Robert L.</span> (1981). The Orchids: Natural History and Classification. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674875257.</ref> The number of orchid genera that exist on every continent is not exact because there is no consensus among the taxonomists about how to split them, however, it can be estimated as follow: [[Eurasia]], about 50 genera; North America, circa 25 genera, Latin America and Caribbean, between 300 and 350; tropical Asia, between 250 and 300; tropical Africa, circa 250; and Oceania, about 60.<ref name="Atwood"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">J.T. Atwood</span> (1986). The size of the Orchidaceae and the systematic ditribution of epiphytic orchids. Selbyana 9, 171-86.</ref>
 
The number of orchid genera that exist on every continent is not exact because there is no consensus among the taxonomists about how to split them, however, it can be estimated as follow: [[Eurasia]], about 50 genera; North America, circa 25 genera, Latin America and Caribbean, between 300 and 350; tropical Asia, between 250 and 300; tropical Africa, circa 250; and Oceania, about 60.<ref Name="Atwood"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">J.T. Atwood</span> (1986). The size of the Orchidaceae and the systematic ditribution of epiphytic orchids. Selbyana 9, 171-86.</ref>


The largest diversity of orchid species occurs in tropical areas of the globe, notably on mountain areas, which are natural bareers that insolate the several populations of plants. Islands also favor development of species but unlikely mountain areas, islands do not favor diversity that much because, unless the island is large enough to have a variety of climates, what is more commen is to find a high number of few endemic species that do not exist anywhere else. Exceptions are large islands as [[Borneo]], [[New Guinea]], [[Madagascar]] and some other, where the diversity is enormous, these have both a high number of endemisms and wealthy of different species. Therefore, some of the main areas in the world noted for having a large number of species are the Islands os Southeast Asia, the mountain areas of Ecuador and Colombia and the Atlantic Jungle along Brazilian coastal mountains, where there are more than fifteen hundred species.<ref Name="Pabst"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Guido Pabst & Fritz Dungs</span> (1975) Orchidaceae Brasilienses vol. 1, Brucke-Verlag Kurt Schmersow, Hildesheim. ISBN 3871050106 </ref> Other important diversity areas are the mountains of [[Mesoamerica]] and the ones south of Himalaya, in [[India]] and [[China]], besides the southeast of [[Africa]], particularly Madagascar.  
The largest diversity of orchid species occurs in tropical areas of the globe, notably on mountain areas, which are natural bareers that insolate the several populations of plants. Islands also favor development of species but unlikely mountain areas, islands do not favor diversity that much because, unless the island is large enough to have a variety of climates, what is more commen is to find a high number of few endemic species that do not exist anywhere else. Exceptions are large islands as [[Borneo]], [[New Guinea]], [[Madagascar]] and some other, where the diversity is enormous, these have both a high number of endemisms and wealthy of different species. Therefore, some of the main areas in the world noted for having a large number of species are the Islands os Southeast Asia, the mountain areas of Ecuador and Colombia and the Atlantic Jungle along Brazilian coastal mountains, where there are more than fifteen hundred species.<ref Name="Pabst"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Guido Pabst & Fritz Dungs</span> (1975) Orchidaceae Brasilienses vol. 1, Brucke-Verlag Kurt Schmersow, Hildesheim. ISBN 3871050106 </ref> Other important diversity areas are the mountains of [[Mesoamerica]] and the ones south of Himalaya, in [[India]] and [[China]], besides the southeast of [[Africa]], particularly Madagascar.  
Line 55: Line 53:


==Taxonomy==
==Taxonomy==
Orchidaceae is considered one of the largest, if not the largest, family among all plant families.<ref Name="Atwood"/> The number of species is close to 25 thousand, corresponding to about eight percent of all seed plants.<ref Name="Kew"/> The exact number of accepted species is four times bigger than the [[mammal]] species and two times the [[bird]]s.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Yohan Pillon e Mark W.Chase.</span> (2006). Taxonomic Exaggeration and its Effects on Orchid Conservation. Conservation Biology vol. 21 Issue 1, Pages 263 - 265.</ref>  These impressive numbers do not take into account the huge amount of new hybridas nad varieties produced by orchid growers every year. Moroever, even today, hundreds of new species have been described yearly, both because of revisions of long established genera but whose species were not well determinated, as due to new species distovered in nature. Only in 2008 the [[International Plant Names Index]] registrered more than four hundred new descriptions.  
Orchidaceae is considered one of the largest, if not the largest, family among all plant families.<ref name="Atwood"/> The number of species is close to 25 thousand, corresponding to about eight percent of all seed plants.<ref Name="Kew"/> The exact number of accepted species is four times bigger than the [[mammal]] species and two times the [[bird]]s.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Yohan Pillon e Mark W.Chase.</span> (2006). Taxonomic Exaggeration and its Effects on Orchid Conservation. Conservation Biology vol. 21 Issue 1, Pages 263 - 265.</ref>  These impressive numbers do not take into account the huge amount of new hybridas nad varieties produced by orchid growers every year. Moroever, even today, hundreds of new species have been described yearly, both because of revisions of long established genera but whose species were not well determinated, as due to new species distovered in nature. Only in 2008 the [[International Plant Names Index]] registrered more than four hundred new descriptions.  


The orchid family was established when [[Antoine Laurent de Jussieu]] published his ''Genera Plantarum'', in 1789.<ref Name="Juss"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Antonii Laurentii de Jussieu</span> (1789). Genera plantarum: secundum ordines naturales disposita, juxta methodum in Horto regio parisiensi exaratam, anno M.DCC.LXXIV. Parisiis: apud viduam Herissant et Theophilum Barrois.</ref> However, before Jussieu's classification, [[Linnaeus]] already had described eight orchid genera which, nevertheless, did not form a family. At the time all epiphytic species belonged to the genus ''[[Epidendrum]]''.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Caroli Linnaei</span> (1753). Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas... Holmiae: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.</ref> Other genus described by Linnaeus was ''[[Orchis]]'', a greek word refering to the shape of two small tubercules that the species of this genus show, which resemble [[testicle]]s.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Pedáneo Dioscórides</span> (50-70 AD). De materia medica.</ref> As this was the first orchid genus to be formally described, from it derived the name of the whole family.<ref Name="Juss"/>
The orchid family was established when [[Antoine Laurent de Jussieu]] published his ''Genera Plantarum'', in 1789.<ref Name="Juss"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Antonii Laurentii de Jussieu</span> (1789). Genera plantarum: secundum ordines naturales disposita, juxta methodum in Horto regio parisiensi exaratam, anno M.DCC.LXXIV. Parisiis: apud viduam Herissant et Theophilum Barrois.</ref> However, before Jussieu's classification, [[Linnaeus]] already had described eight orchid genera which, nevertheless, did not form a family. At the time all epiphytic species belonged to the genus ''[[Epidendrum]]''.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Caroli Linnaei</span> (1753). Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas... Holmiae: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.</ref> Other genus described by Linnaeus was ''[[Orchis]]'', a greek word refering to the shape of two small tubercules that the species of this genus show, which resemble [[testicle]]s.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Pedáneo Dioscórides</span> (50-70 AD). De materia medica.</ref> As this was the first orchid genus to be formally described, from it derived the name of the whole family.<ref Name="Juss"/>


Since Orchidaceae was proposed, the research of its species has not been interrupted. Their [[Systematic|classification]] passed through numberless revisions and the amount of known genera they are divided has been increasing throughout the years, now reaching more than eight hundred.<ref name="GO-Cribb"><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Phillip Cribb</span> (2001) Orchidaceae. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.</ref> Their exact number is not known because there is no consensus about the best way of splitting the genera. According to each reference, the list of accepted genera are diverse and the total number much different. A good example is a comparation between the number of genera published since 2002 to classify species before subordinated to genus ''[[Dendrobium]]'', about thirty,<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Clements, M.A. and D.L. Jones </span>(2002). Nomenclatural changes in the Dendrobieae (Orchidaceae) 1: The Australasian region. Orchadian  13(11): 485-497.</ref> and the number of these which are actually accepted by the database of the [[Royal Botanic Garden]], three or four.<ref name="Kew"/> The most recent trend is the classification based upon genetic, or molecular information called [[Phylogeny]], which in theory reflects the evolutionary relations among each one of the species, groups of species, genera, and so forth. However, this system is comparatively new and not all researchers fully accept it, many still basing their conclusions mostly on morphologycal diagnosis. The debate is lively held on both fronts. One of the defensors of Phylogenetics is [[M.W.Chase|Mark Chase]], who places morphology on a secondary level,<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Mark W. Chase</span> (2001) Molecular Systematics, Parcimony and Orchid Classification. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1: pp.83. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.</ref> Among the morphologists one of the most noted is [[Carlyle August Luer]], who since 1978 dedicated to study the species of subtribe [[Pleurothallidinae]] and thinks atha phylogenetic should be regarded only as an extra tool for now.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carlyle August Luer</span> (2004). Icones Pleurothallidinarum, Volume XXVI, A Second Century of New Species of Stelis of Ecuador. pp.253. Missouri Botanical Garden. ISBN 1930723292</ref> Luer has described about three thousand new species of orchids.
Since Orchidaceae was proposed, the research of its species has not been interrupted. Their [[Systematic|classification]] passed through numberless revisions and the amount of known genera they are divided has been increasing throughout the years, now reaching more than eight hundred.<ref name="GO-Cribb"><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Phillip Cribb</span> (2001) Orchidaceae. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.</ref> Their exact number is not known because there is no consensus about the best way of splitting the genera. According to each reference, the list of accepted genera are diverse and the total number much different. A good example is a comparation between the number of genera published since 2002 to classify species before subordinated to genus ''[[Dendrobium]]'', about thirty,<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Clements, M.A. and D.L. Jones </span>(2002). Nomenclatural changes in the Dendrobieae (Orchidaceae) 1: The Australasian region. Orchadian  13(11): 485-497.</ref> and the number of these which are actually accepted by the database of the [[Royal Botanic Garden]], three or four.<ref name="Kew"/> The most recent trend is the classification based upon genetic, or molecular information called [[Phylogeny]], which in theory reflects the evolutionary relations among each one of the species, groups of species, genera, and so forth. However, this system is comparatively new and not all researchers fully accept it, many still basing their conclusions mostly on morphologycal diagnosis. The debate is lively held on both fronts. One of the defensors of Phylogenetics is [[M.W.Chase|Mark Chase]], who places morphology on a secondary level,<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Mark W. Chase</span> (2001) Molecular Systematics, Parcimony and Orchid Classification. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1: pp.83. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.</ref> Among the morphologists one of the most noted is [[Carlyle August Luer]], who since 1978 dedicated to study the species of subtribe [[Pleurothallidinae]] and thinks atha phylogenetic should be regarded only as an extra tool for now.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Carlyle August Luer</span> (2004). Icones Pleurothallidinarum, Volume XXVI, A Second Century of New Species of Stelis of Ecuador. pp.253. Missouri Botanical Garden. ISBN 1930723292</ref> Luer has described about three thousand new species of orchids.
Orchidaceae is a family passing through an active cycle of evoluctionary development. Traditionaly, Biology considers the species concept as a group of beings that can breed producing fertile descendants. Orchid species are slightly different because they do not fit well in this concept. Not only most of the species can interbreed with several other producing fertile descendants, as most of the genera that belong to the same subtribe can do too.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">de Queiroz, K.</span> (2005). Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. volume 102 Suppl.1 pp. 6600–7  [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15851674 pmid=15851674]</ref>  It is not uncommon to encounter natural hybrids between diferent species and genera in the wild, and although almost all these plants are fertile, the are not more common just because as orchids are highly adaptated to their polinator, these hybrids may occur by chance and their particular resulting morphology are not really adaptated to the existing polinators. There are some rare exceptions, when these hybrids are result of breedings of two closely related species and still can be polinated by the same polinators of parent species. When this happens it is more likely that along the years a new species can appear. This may be the case of ''[[Cattleya × mesquitae]]''. It is a natural hybrid discovered  in 1996 in Goiás State in [[Brazil]]. We know know that this species is a result of a high degree of interbreeding of ''[[Cattleya walkeriana]]'' and ''[[Cattleya nobilior]]''. As the result of this breeding is pollinated by the same agents of its parents, the crossing has been occuring again and again between the three species from the area along the ages, thus one of the original parents cannot be found there anymore. All original plants have crossed and faded. Today we know ''[[Cattleya × mesquitae]]'' is a hybrid because similar plants have been procuced by artificial breedings. Lou Menezes, its describer, claims that this species is so ancient that they have even evolved in nature, developing a fragrance that is not present on the hybrids artificially produced.<ref><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Menezes, Lou. C.</span> ''Cattleya × mesquitae'' in Boletim CAOB vol.26 p.24. São Paulo, 1996.</ref> This is one of the ways a new species can appear in ithe wild. Cases like this are not uncommon among orchids, therefore many species are hard to circunscribe exactly because they result of different degrees of breedings between closely related species in a given area. It is also possible that one day many species described by Botanists may be proved to be in fact natural hybrids long stablished in nature.<ref name="FBHOEHNE"/>
As the species traditional concept does not fully apply to orchids, the circunscription of each species sometimes is very complicated. Many groups may be isolated and show subtle differences that some taxonomists may think are enough to establish independent species while other may think these are just natural variations of populations separated for long time but not yet important enough to justify the stablisment of another species.<ref name="borneo1"><span style="font-variant:small-caps">Chan, C.L. (1994)</span>. The species concept, pp. 27 in Orchids Of Borneo. The Sabah Society and Kew: Bentham-Moxon Trust, Volume 1. ISBN 967 99947 3 2</ref> Therefore the exact number of orchid species to be accepted by the scientific comunity is highly variable according to each reference.
==Hybrids==
Fertile orchid hybrids can be artificialy crossed with other species of the same or of other genera and produce new generations of fertile hybrids. today there are hybrids involving up to eight genera and as time passes it is likely even more genera will be crossed. The [[Royal  Horticultural Society]] is responsible for keeping the records of these hybrids up to date. The capacity orchids have to interbreed is one of their carachtheristics more valuated by growers because it enables them to mix the species obtaining endless combinations of new colors and patterns.


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}

Revision as of 16:13, 1 March 2009

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
This editable Main Article has an approved citable version (see its Citable Version subpage). While we have done conscientious work, we cannot guarantee that this Main Article, or its citable version, is wholly free of mistakes. By helping to improve this editable Main Article, you will help the process of generating a new, improved citable version.
Orchidaceae
Cypripedium reginae
Cypripedium reginae
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Plantae
Division: Magnoliophyta
Class: Liliopsida
Order: Asparagales
Family: Orchidaceae
Juss. 1789
Type genus
Orchis L. 1753
Subfamilies
Synonyms

There are literally tens of thousands of species, cultivars and varieties in the orchid family, the largest family of flowering plants. The word orchid may refer to any of the botanical family Orchidaceae, or, more commonly among lay persons, any of thousands of flowers called "orchids".

Orchids are ancient, and have been cultivated for centuries. They range from rare and recent discoveries such as the tiny Tallong Midge Orchid to the large, showy orchids which are featured in bouquets and corsages, to food orchids such as vanilla. A few orchids have insignificant flowers and are grown for their foliage.

Orchids seemed to be fascinating: every developed nation has many orchid societies, and this fascination extends beyond form and beauty. Because of their biological importance (some orchids have developed extraordinary systems of pollination, for example, "Lady's Slipper" traps insects and so forces them to pollinate the flower; one Australian orchid exists underground and is pollinated by ants; many give off attractive odours), orchids hold just as much interest for scientists. Famed biologist Ernst Mayr discovered and named 38 new species of orchid. [1]

Distribution

Despite their distribution is largely irregular throughout the globe, orchids can be found in almost all regions of the planet, except Antartic continet. Due to their wide greographic distribution, it is natural that a so diverse group of plants show high degree of adaptation to different climates and to the multiplicity of polinators present in each area.[2] The number of orchid genera that exist on every continent is not exact because there is no consensus among the taxonomists about how to split them, however, it can be estimated as follow: Eurasia, about 50 genera; North America, circa 25 genera, Latin America and Caribbean, between 300 and 350; tropical Asia, between 250 and 300; tropical Africa, circa 250; and Oceania, about 60.[3]

The largest diversity of orchid species occurs in tropical areas of the globe, notably on mountain areas, which are natural bareers that insolate the several populations of plants. Islands also favor development of species but unlikely mountain areas, islands do not favor diversity that much because, unless the island is large enough to have a variety of climates, what is more commen is to find a high number of few endemic species that do not exist anywhere else. Exceptions are large islands as Borneo, New Guinea, Madagascar and some other, where the diversity is enormous, these have both a high number of endemisms and wealthy of different species. Therefore, some of the main areas in the world noted for having a large number of species are the Islands os Southeast Asia, the mountain areas of Ecuador and Colombia and the Atlantic Jungle along Brazilian coastal mountains, where there are more than fifteen hundred species.[4] Other important diversity areas are the mountains of Mesoamerica and the ones south of Himalaya, in India and China, besides the southeast of Africa, particularly Madagascar. Ecuador is the country where the largest number of orchid species is reported, up to 3,549,[5] imediately followed by Colombia, with 2,723,[5] New Guinea, 2,717,[5] and Brazil, with a total of 2,590.[5] Among others, Borneo, Sumatra, Madagascar, Venezuela and Costa Rica, are countries with high number of species.[5]

Habit

The most common kinds of orchids in each of these areas are highly variable. On tropical regions, where the light and humidity are high, yet the competition for light with tree species is strong, the orchids tent to be predominat epiphytical, however, many species of terrestrial species, able to thrive without high amounts of light do exist too.[6] Looking for light, under the shadow of trees up to forty meters tall, this herbs grow over their branches and stems, at diverse heights, according to the necessities of each species. Their roots, exposed to the air, obtain most ot the nutrients from decaying material that acumulates around them, from the rains that washes the tree leaves from above, or from the air dust. Orchid roots are recovered by a spongy tissue called velamen. Associated with the velamen, most of orchids host a fungus known as Mycorrhyza that helps on decomposing of organic material breaking them into mineral salts, making easier their absortion by orchids. In extreem conditions, orchids may to some extent, absorve water and nutrients thorough the pores on their leaves, leaving to the roots only the function of sustaining the plant attached to the substract. No orchid is a parasite, what means their presence never damages their hosts, despite, in exceptional cases, some tree branches may not be strong enough to sustain the weight of a large colony and may end broken. There are many terrestrial orchids on tropical areas too, although, differently form the ones from temperate regions, many may keep growing almost constantly during most of the year.[6] The great amount of organic material available on forests soil favors the occurence of few saprophytic species of orchids without chlorophyll, which obtain all their nutrients from substances rejected by the processing of decomposing material by fungi associated to them.

In regions where the climate is colder, where the grassfilds are most common, or in dryer and rockier areas with small bushes, orchids are basicly terrestrial plants with buried roots, sometimes developes into tubercules which eneble them to resist winter and snow, ot to long droughs and occasional fires.[7] The snow might frost epiphytic species withouth sheltered roots to store the nutrients needed to shot a new grouth in springtime. Also the fires would enterely burn epiphyitic species. In this areas subject to most defined seasonal climatel, the plants normally hace a distinct period of dormancy while often their aerial segments die to avoid damages to their physiology due to extreem droughs or cold.

Some especies are considered endangered of extinction in the wild, both because of extensive collection, as due to the cut of forests for agriculture and even by the utilization of defoliating substances during wars from the past.[8] Surpringly enough, the majority of the endangered species are included among the most common under cultivation and the more frequently commercially grown.[9] Most of really rare species are not found on the lists of endangered species because they have no comercial value and low interest because of their tiny flowers or difficulty of culture. Ordinarily, for the same reasons, governments do not sponsor any surveys about the existing population of these in the wild and the few ones that exist are just occasional or made by private or academic researchers.[10]

Other important fact to consider against extinction is that each orchid fruit can contain hundreds of thousands seeds, and that the existence of two or three individuals unter culture may produce, in a few years, a fantastic number of plants, making the extinction threat of an orchid much different from the same threat to an animal, that just have one or few cubs each pregnancy.

Taxonomy

Orchidaceae is considered one of the largest, if not the largest, family among all plant families.[3] The number of species is close to 25 thousand, corresponding to about eight percent of all seed plants.[11] The exact number of accepted species is four times bigger than the mammal species and two times the birds.[12] These impressive numbers do not take into account the huge amount of new hybridas nad varieties produced by orchid growers every year. Moroever, even today, hundreds of new species have been described yearly, both because of revisions of long established genera but whose species were not well determinated, as due to new species distovered in nature. Only in 2008 the International Plant Names Index registrered more than four hundred new descriptions.

The orchid family was established when Antoine Laurent de Jussieu published his Genera Plantarum, in 1789.[13] However, before Jussieu's classification, Linnaeus already had described eight orchid genera which, nevertheless, did not form a family. At the time all epiphytic species belonged to the genus Epidendrum.[14] Other genus described by Linnaeus was Orchis, a greek word refering to the shape of two small tubercules that the species of this genus show, which resemble testicles.[15] As this was the first orchid genus to be formally described, from it derived the name of the whole family.[13]

Since Orchidaceae was proposed, the research of its species has not been interrupted. Their classification passed through numberless revisions and the amount of known genera they are divided has been increasing throughout the years, now reaching more than eight hundred.[16] Their exact number is not known because there is no consensus about the best way of splitting the genera. According to each reference, the list of accepted genera are diverse and the total number much different. A good example is a comparation between the number of genera published since 2002 to classify species before subordinated to genus Dendrobium, about thirty,[17] and the number of these which are actually accepted by the database of the Royal Botanic Garden, three or four.[11] The most recent trend is the classification based upon genetic, or molecular information called Phylogeny, which in theory reflects the evolutionary relations among each one of the species, groups of species, genera, and so forth. However, this system is comparatively new and not all researchers fully accept it, many still basing their conclusions mostly on morphologycal diagnosis. The debate is lively held on both fronts. One of the defensors of Phylogenetics is Mark Chase, who places morphology on a secondary level,[18] Among the morphologists one of the most noted is Carlyle August Luer, who since 1978 dedicated to study the species of subtribe Pleurothallidinae and thinks atha phylogenetic should be regarded only as an extra tool for now.[19] Luer has described about three thousand new species of orchids.

Orchidaceae is a family passing through an active cycle of evoluctionary development. Traditionaly, Biology considers the species concept as a group of beings that can breed producing fertile descendants. Orchid species are slightly different because they do not fit well in this concept. Not only most of the species can interbreed with several other producing fertile descendants, as most of the genera that belong to the same subtribe can do too.[20] It is not uncommon to encounter natural hybrids between diferent species and genera in the wild, and although almost all these plants are fertile, the are not more common just because as orchids are highly adaptated to their polinator, these hybrids may occur by chance and their particular resulting morphology are not really adaptated to the existing polinators. There are some rare exceptions, when these hybrids are result of breedings of two closely related species and still can be polinated by the same polinators of parent species. When this happens it is more likely that along the years a new species can appear. This may be the case of Cattleya × mesquitae. It is a natural hybrid discovered in 1996 in Goiás State in Brazil. We know know that this species is a result of a high degree of interbreeding of Cattleya walkeriana and Cattleya nobilior. As the result of this breeding is pollinated by the same agents of its parents, the crossing has been occuring again and again between the three species from the area along the ages, thus one of the original parents cannot be found there anymore. All original plants have crossed and faded. Today we know Cattleya × mesquitae is a hybrid because similar plants have been procuced by artificial breedings. Lou Menezes, its describer, claims that this species is so ancient that they have even evolved in nature, developing a fragrance that is not present on the hybrids artificially produced.[21] This is one of the ways a new species can appear in ithe wild. Cases like this are not uncommon among orchids, therefore many species are hard to circunscribe exactly because they result of different degrees of breedings between closely related species in a given area. It is also possible that one day many species described by Botanists may be proved to be in fact natural hybrids long stablished in nature.[6]

As the species traditional concept does not fully apply to orchids, the circunscription of each species sometimes is very complicated. Many groups may be isolated and show subtle differences that some taxonomists may think are enough to establish independent species while other may think these are just natural variations of populations separated for long time but not yet important enough to justify the stablisment of another species.[10] Therefore the exact number of orchid species to be accepted by the scientific comunity is highly variable according to each reference.

Hybrids

Fertile orchid hybrids can be artificialy crossed with other species of the same or of other genera and produce new generations of fertile hybrids. today there are hybrids involving up to eight genera and as time passes it is likely even more genera will be crossed. The Royal Horticultural Society is responsible for keeping the records of these hybrids up to date. The capacity orchids have to interbreed is one of their carachtheristics more valuated by growers because it enables them to mix the species obtaining endless combinations of new colors and patterns.


References

  1. Ernst Mayr Biography: The Darwin of the 20th Century. Sourced on 22nd November 2007.
  2. Dressler, Robert L. (1981). The Orchids: Natural History and Classification. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674875257.
  3. 3.0 3.1 J.T. Atwood (1986). The size of the Orchidaceae and the systematic ditribution of epiphytic orchids. Selbyana 9, 171-86.
  4. Guido Pabst & Fritz Dungs (1975) Orchidaceae Brasilienses vol. 1, Brucke-Verlag Kurt Schmersow, Hildesheim. ISBN 3871050106
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 R. Govaerts, M.A. Campacci (Brazil, 2005), D. Holland Baptista (Brazil, 2005), P.Cribb (K, 2003), Alex George (K, 2003), K.Kreuz (2004, Europe), J.Wood (K, 2003, Europe) World Checklist of Orchidaceae. The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Checklists by region and Botanical countries.Published on Internet access 1st March 2009.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Hoehne, Frederico Carlos (1940) Flora Brasílica, Part.1, Volume 12.1; 1 - 12 - Orchidaceae, introdução. Secretaria da Agricultura, Indústria e Comércio de São Paulo - Brasil, 1940.
  7. Karsten H. K. Wodrich e A. A. Balkema. (1997). Growing South African Indigenous Orchids. ISBN 978-9054106500.
  8. Leonid Averyanov, Phillip Cribb, Phan Le Loc, and Nguyen Tien Hiep. (2003). Slipper Orchids of Vietnam. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon. ISBN 0881925926
  9. Eric Hansen (2000). Orchid Fever. Methuen. ISBN 0413747506.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Chan, C.L. (1994). The species concept, pp. 27 in Orchids Of Borneo. The Sabah Society and Kew: Bentham-Moxon Trust, Volume 1. ISBN 967 9994732 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "borneo1" defined multiple times with different content
  11. 11.0 11.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Kew
  12. Yohan Pillon e Mark W.Chase. (2006). Taxonomic Exaggeration and its Effects on Orchid Conservation. Conservation Biology vol. 21 Issue 1, Pages 263 - 265.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Antonii Laurentii de Jussieu (1789). Genera plantarum: secundum ordines naturales disposita, juxta methodum in Horto regio parisiensi exaratam, anno M.DCC.LXXIV. Parisiis: apud viduam Herissant et Theophilum Barrois.
  14. Caroli Linnaei (1753). Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas... Holmiae: Impensis Laurentii Salvii.
  15. Pedáneo Dioscórides (50-70 AD). De materia medica.
  16. Phillip Cribb (2001) Orchidaceae. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.
  17. Clements, M.A. and D.L. Jones (2002). Nomenclatural changes in the Dendrobieae (Orchidaceae) 1: The Australasian region. Orchadian 13(11): 485-497.
  18. Mark W. Chase (2001) Molecular Systematics, Parcimony and Orchid Classification. Em A. M. Pridgeon, P. J. Cribb, M. W. Chase, and F. N. Rasmussen eds., Genera Orchidacearum, vol. 1: pp.83. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0198505132.
  19. Carlyle August Luer (2004). Icones Pleurothallidinarum, Volume XXVI, A Second Century of New Species of Stelis of Ecuador. pp.253. Missouri Botanical Garden. ISBN 1930723292
  20. de Queiroz, K. (2005). Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. volume 102 Suppl.1 pp. 6600–7 pmid=15851674
  21. Menezes, Lou. C. Cattleya × mesquitae in Boletim CAOB vol.26 p.24. São Paulo, 1996.