Talk:Wales: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(A note on the south)
imported>John Stephenson
(exploitation -> mining)
Line 7: Line 7:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
This clearly has something to do with it, but I think it might be a bit simplistic and out-of-date to make such a blanket statement. Surely it also has to do with the economic and linguistic differences? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CST)
This clearly has something to do with it, but I think it might be a bit simplistic and out-of-date to make such a blanket statement. Surely it also has to do with the economic and linguistic differences? [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CST)
:I have changed "exploitation" to "mining" - I think the reader can infer it was exploitation. I think this is more even-handed. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:10, 7 November 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 21:10, 7 November 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A country of the United Kingdom that historically was considered a principality; population about 3,000,000. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Geography, History and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

The South

Is it really true, in all cases, to say that the reason that the south is more Anglicised is:

owing to the extensive exploitation of its natural resources, such as coal and gold, by the English in the 19th century.

This clearly has something to do with it, but I think it might be a bit simplistic and out-of-date to make such a blanket statement. Surely it also has to do with the economic and linguistic differences? John Stephenson 19:51, 7 November 2007 (CST)

I have changed "exploitation" to "mining" - I think the reader can infer it was exploitation. I think this is more even-handed. John Stephenson 20:10, 7 November 2007 (CST)