Talk:Europe: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
(→‎New structure: new section)
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 4: Line 4:


I have set up a new structure in the hope of attracting  contributions on a broader range of subjects than is covered by the current draft. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 20:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
I have set up a new structure in the hope of attracting  contributions on a broader range of subjects than is covered by the current draft. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 20:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
==States of Europe==
It is gratifying to see a fresh contribution so soon! The table seems to me to be a valuable addition to the article,  but it  interrupts the flow, and is inconsistent with the existing format,  so I propose to delete it from the main  page and add a link to it on  an  addendum subpage. I have created an addendum subpage  for that purpose and copied the table to it.
However it is not my practice to make changes without  providing an opportunity for discussion, so I shall defer the deletion for a few days. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 21:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:21, 22 December 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Sixth largest continent; area 10,000,000 km2; pop. 720,000,000 [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Geography, Politics and Sociology [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

New structure

I have set up a new structure in the hope of attracting contributions on a broader range of subjects than is covered by the current draft. Nick Gardner 20:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

States of Europe

It is gratifying to see a fresh contribution so soon! The table seems to me to be a valuable addition to the article, but it interrupts the flow, and is inconsistent with the existing format, so I propose to delete it from the main page and add a link to it on an addendum subpage. I have created an addendum subpage for that purpose and copied the table to it.

However it is not my practice to make changes without providing an opportunity for discussion, so I shall defer the deletion for a few days. Nick Gardner 21:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC)