User talk:Pierre-Alain Gouanvic: Difference between revisions
imported>D. Matt Innis (→good info: new section) |
imported>D. Matt Innis m (→good info) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== good info == | == good info == | ||
Hi Pierre, I just saw [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk%3AEvidence-based_medicine&diff=100212209&oldid=100212021 your discussion] on [[Talk: | Hi Pierre, I just saw [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk%3AEvidence-based_medicine&diff=100212209&oldid=100212021 your discussion] on [[Talk:Evidence based medicine]. That is a good analysis and good point that should be in the article. Why don't you see if you can squeeze it in somewhere. --D. Matt Innis 00:43, 18 November 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 00:44, 18 November 2007
Citizendium Getting Started | |||
---|---|---|---|
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians |
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! --Larry Sanger 00:35, 17 August 2007 (CDT)
Interesting
Interesting bio on your userpage, Pierre. Nice to you around, and let me know if I can ever assist you with things around here. Stephen Ewen 16:51, 13 November 2007 (CST)
Welcome and thanks
I'm just spending some time this morning thanking the newer/returned people who have been doing work on the wiki lately. So, thanks, nice to have you here! --Larry Sanger 09:39, 17 November 2007 (CST)
good info
Hi Pierre, I just saw your discussion on [[Talk:Evidence based medicine]. That is a good analysis and good point that should be in the article. Why don't you see if you can squeeze it in somewhere. --D. Matt Innis 00:43, 18 November 2007 (CST)