Talk:Unertan Syndrome: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(TI workgroup)
imported>James A. Flippin
(→‎Needs some work: How does TI workgroup work?)
Line 16: Line 16:
:Shouldn't it be written by someone who didn't discover and name the disease? [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
:Shouldn't it be written by someone who didn't discover and name the disease? [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
::It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information.  That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
::It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information.  That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
:::I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. [[User:James A. Flippin|James A. Flippin]] 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:29, 27 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Unertan Syndrome"
Workgroup category or categories Health Sciences Workgroup, Topic Informant Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Matt Innis (Talk) 09:01, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Needs some work

This article needs some work to make it read as an encyclopedic entry on the topic rather than primary source research by the author. --Matt Innis (Talk) 09:06, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

Shouldn't it be written by someone who didn't discover and name the disease? James A. Flippin 09:04, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
It certainly needs to be heavily edited by someone not associated with it, I agree, though Dr. Tan would certainly be the reasonable source for the information. That is why the Topic Informant workgroup is involved. --Matt Innis (Talk) 09:53, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
I see. I guess I don't quite understand how the whole TI workgroup thing works. I thought the idea was to have the TI provide information in a separate space, but never actually write the article, and at this point he's written the whole thing. James A. Flippin 10:29, 27 June 2007 (CDT)