Talk:Race (social): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen |
imported>Eric Winesett No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This article takes a position and is thus problematic in its current form on neutrality grounds. It does throughout and builds to, "The race concept remains fruitful for the study of historical events." It is lacking discussion that the concept of "race" itself is a serious contention among biological and other anthropologists; that "race" is widely held as a mere social construct and that historically the concept of "race" developed alongside ''racism''. And so forth. ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 13:09, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | This article takes a position and is thus problematic in its current form on neutrality grounds. It does throughout and builds to, "The race concept remains fruitful for the study of historical events." It is lacking discussion that the concept of "race" itself is a serious contention among biological and other anthropologists; that "race" is widely held as a mere social construct and that historically the concept of "race" developed alongside ''racism''. And so forth. ---[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 13:09, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:The article shows bias, but it also just doesn't read like an article about race ''per se'', but an essay on the interaction of race, class, and ethnicity in regard to United States government policy. --[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 13:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 12:22, 9 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Anthropology Workgroup, Sociology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Frank W Sweet 11:03, 9 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
CZ:Neutrality_Policy
This article takes a position and is thus problematic in its current form on neutrality grounds. It does throughout and builds to, "The race concept remains fruitful for the study of historical events." It is lacking discussion that the concept of "race" itself is a serious contention among biological and other anthropologists; that "race" is widely held as a mere social construct and that historically the concept of "race" developed alongside racism. And so forth. ---Stephen Ewen 13:09, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- The article shows bias, but it also just doesn't read like an article about race per se, but an essay on the interaction of race, class, and ethnicity in regard to United States government policy. --Eric Winesett 13:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Anthropology Category Check
- Sociology Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Anthropology Advanced Articles
- Anthropology Nonstub Articles
- Anthropology Internal Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Anthropology Developed Articles
- Sociology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Anthropology Developing Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Anthropology Stub Articles
- Sociology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Anthropology External Articles
- Sociology External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Anthropology Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Anthropology Cleanup
- Sociology Cleanup