Talk:Magnocellular neurosecretory cell: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Brendan Cody
No edit summary
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                 abc = Magnocellular neurosecretory cell
Please note, this article was imported from WP; but I wholly wrote it there[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
|               cat1 = Biology
:Enjoyable article that proves I really need new glasses. Initially, my vision center interpreted it as "magnetocellular", and I wondered if you and Daniel had come up with a neuroimaging procedure that involved shaving the patient's head and sprinkling it with iron filings. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
|               cat2 =
 
|                cat3 =
::- One of my papers had an error that I only just spotted in proof - the copy editors had changed magnocellular to magnetocellular in the title. You ''never'' check the title in proofs. As I found later when another paper had "Oxytoxin" in the title instead of "oxytocin". I missed that one for years:-)[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 17:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
|          cat_check = n
 
|              status = 2
:::You clearly don't have the right sort of proofreaders. When finishing one of my books, the publisher insisted that the hand-marked galley pages must be returned in their entirety.  To review, I carefully made a pile, on my dining table, of each chapter. My beloved editorial assistant of the time, Clifford (properly Clifford, Lord Chatterley), leaped effortlessly to the table, considered the work, and carefully deposited a hairball on each of two chapters.
|        underlinked = y
 
|            cleanup = n
:::Informing my editor that if she really wanted those pages, I could arrange biologically safe shipping containers. She told me that she, as well, had feline editorial staff, understood the pages completely, and that I could just tell her if any changers were to be made on those pages.
|                  by = [[User:Brendan Cody|Brendan Cody]] 09:28, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
 
}}
:::"Public key cryptography" is a perfectly valid technical term. Unfortunately, I got through an entire lecture before realizing I had written "pubic key" on the board, without a chastity belt in sight. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:58, 26 December 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Large neuroendocrine neuron in the supraoptic nucleus and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that projects to the posterior pituitary gland. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Biology [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  Neuroendocrinology
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Please note, this article was imported from WP; but I wholly wrote it thereGareth Leng 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Enjoyable article that proves I really need new glasses. Initially, my vision center interpreted it as "magnetocellular", and I wondered if you and Daniel had come up with a neuroimaging procedure that involved shaving the patient's head and sprinkling it with iron filings. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- One of my papers had an error that I only just spotted in proof - the copy editors had changed magnocellular to magnetocellular in the title. You never check the title in proofs. As I found later when another paper had "Oxytoxin" in the title instead of "oxytocin". I missed that one for years:-)Gareth Leng 17:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
You clearly don't have the right sort of proofreaders. When finishing one of my books, the publisher insisted that the hand-marked galley pages must be returned in their entirety. To review, I carefully made a pile, on my dining table, of each chapter. My beloved editorial assistant of the time, Clifford (properly Clifford, Lord Chatterley), leaped effortlessly to the table, considered the work, and carefully deposited a hairball on each of two chapters.
Informing my editor that if she really wanted those pages, I could arrange biologically safe shipping containers. She told me that she, as well, had feline editorial staff, understood the pages completely, and that I could just tell her if any changers were to be made on those pages.
"Public key cryptography" is a perfectly valid technical term. Unfortunately, I got through an entire lecture before realizing I had written "pubic key" on the board, without a chastity belt in sight. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)