Talk:Tecum Umam: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen m (→Article Status) |
imported>Joe Quick |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Suggestions: 1) remove all the headings and go over it to make sure it reads as one narrative whole, then re-add them. 2) "The jury is still out"--just too much of a cliche, I think. Very nice work, otherwise! [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:43, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | :Suggestions: 1) remove all the headings and go over it to make sure it reads as one narrative whole, then re-add them. 2) "The jury is still out"--just too much of a cliche, I think. Very nice work, otherwise! [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 03:43, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::1)Doesn't work for me. Removing headers, building bridges and then re-adding headers tends to do little but make my writing redundant and contrived. Others are certainly welcome to try - we can always revert if it gets to be too ridiculous. | |||
::2)Agreed. :-) I thought so even as I typed it. If anyone can come up with a better transition, I encourage you to be bold. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]] ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 12:14, 23 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:14, 23 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup, Anthropology Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:04, 13 April 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Comment
Very nice work so far, Joe. :-) Stephen Ewen 18:24, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
Article Status
Having finished the last of my major planned revisions, I've changed the article status to "developed." While this article could probably benefit from a variety of small changes and stylistic copyediting, I consider it finished. To the best of my knowledge, it is both accurate and complete and it should be ready for approval as soon as a qualified editor comes along (or one of the current ones decides that s/he is qualified). ;-) --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:09, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
- Suggestions: 1) remove all the headings and go over it to make sure it reads as one narrative whole, then re-add them. 2) "The jury is still out"--just too much of a cliche, I think. Very nice work, otherwise! Stephen Ewen 03:43, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- 1)Doesn't work for me. Removing headers, building bridges and then re-adding headers tends to do little but make my writing redundant and contrived. Others are certainly welcome to try - we can always revert if it gets to be too ridiculous.
- 2)Agreed. :-) I thought so even as I typed it. If anyone can come up with a better transition, I encourage you to be bold. --Joe Quick (Talk) 12:14, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Anthropology Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Anthropology Advanced Articles
- Anthropology Nonstub Articles
- Anthropology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Anthropology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Anthropology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- Anthropology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- Anthropology External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Anthropology Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Anthropology Cleanup
- Cleanup