Talk:Love Shack: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa m (Sigh, no article yet...) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Maintainability== | |||
I have a request. | I have a request. | ||
If you want to add articles about pop songs, then please go to [[CZ:Music Workgroup]] and from there create a link to a new policy page in which you lay out a suggested format and standards for articles about pop songs. Among these should be this important question: ''given'' that we lack the resources (and will continue to lack them for a long time) to manage a ''complete'' database of the songs of even very popular bands, what practical ''and well-reasoned'' criteria can we use to determine whether a song fits our maintainability requirements? On the latter, search [[CZ:Policy Outline]] for "maintainability." | If you want to add articles about pop songs, then please go to [[CZ:Music Workgroup]] and from there create a link to a new policy page in which you lay out a suggested format and standards for articles about pop songs. Among these should be this important question: ''given'' that we lack the resources (and will continue to lack them for a long time) to manage a ''complete'' database of the songs of even very popular bands, what practical ''and well-reasoned'' criteria can we use to determine whether a song fits our maintainability requirements? On the latter, <!--search [[CZ:Policy Outline]] for "maintainability." --> see [[CZ:Maintainability]]. | ||
Sorry to give you so much work, but I'd like to do this right. :-) | Sorry to give you so much work, but I'd like to do this right. :-) | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
Also I suspect that with the limitless numbers of song names, it's best that we always affix "(song)" to the page title: [[Love Shack (song)]]. | Also I suspect that with the limitless numbers of song names, it's best that we always affix "(song)" to the page title: [[Love Shack (song)]]. | ||
Thanks in advance! | Thanks in advance! [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:15, 5 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Consider this one of my many test cases I'll be bringing over in the coming days, Larry. I'm hoping we can handle things sanely. --[[User:Jeff Raymond|Jeff Raymond]] 13:23, 5 February 2007 (CST) | :Consider this one of my many test cases I'll be bringing over in the coming days, Larry. I'm hoping we can handle things sanely. --[[User:Jeff Raymond|Jeff Raymond]] 13:23, 5 February 2007 (CST) | ||
OK-dokey but what are you testing? And do you agree that we can do this sanely only if we have the above standards worked out? Deep TIA --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:35, 5 February 2007 (CST) | |||
::OK-dokey but what are you testing? And do you agree that we can do this sanely only if we have the above standards worked out? Deep TIA --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:35, 5 February 2007 (CST) | |||
:::TIA? I have a few articles I'm looking to port over/work on, and hopefully that will work out. Obviously I have no ability to "test" test, but yeah. --[[User:Jeff Raymond|Jeff Raymond]] 19:54, 5 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 14 May 2008
Maintainability
I have a request.
If you want to add articles about pop songs, then please go to CZ:Music Workgroup and from there create a link to a new policy page in which you lay out a suggested format and standards for articles about pop songs. Among these should be this important question: given that we lack the resources (and will continue to lack them for a long time) to manage a complete database of the songs of even very popular bands, what practical and well-reasoned criteria can we use to determine whether a song fits our maintainability requirements? On the latter, see CZ:Maintainability.
Sorry to give you so much work, but I'd like to do this right. :-)
Also I suspect that with the limitless numbers of song names, it's best that we always affix "(song)" to the page title: Love Shack (song).
Thanks in advance! Larry Sanger 13:15, 5 February 2007 (CST)
- Consider this one of my many test cases I'll be bringing over in the coming days, Larry. I'm hoping we can handle things sanely. --Jeff Raymond 13:23, 5 February 2007 (CST)
- OK-dokey but what are you testing? And do you agree that we can do this sanely only if we have the above standards worked out? Deep TIA --Larry Sanger 19:35, 5 February 2007 (CST)
- TIA? I have a few articles I'm looking to port over/work on, and hopefully that will work out. Obviously I have no ability to "test" test, but yeah. --Jeff Raymond 19:54, 5 February 2007 (CST)