Talk:Love Shack: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger (Request to folks adding song articles to CZ) |
imported>Jeff Raymond (r to Larry) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:15, 5 February 2007 (CST) | --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:15, 5 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:Consider this one of my many test cases I'll be bringing over in the coming days, Larry. I'm hoping we can handle things sanely. --[[User:Jeff Raymond|Jeff Raymond]] 13:23, 5 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 14:23, 5 February 2007
I have a request.
If you want to add articles about pop songs, then please go to CZ:Music Workgroup and from there create a link to a new policy page in which you lay out a suggested format and standards for articles about pop songs. Among these should be this important question: given that we lack the resources (and will continue to lack them for a long time) to manage a complete database of the songs of even very popular bands, what practical and well-reasoned criteria can we use to determine whether a song fits our maintainability requirements? On the latter, search CZ:Policy Outline for "maintainability."
Sorry to give you so much work, but I'd like to do this right. :-)
Also I suspect that with the limitless numbers of song names, it's best that we always affix "(song)" to the page title: Love Shack (song).
Thanks in advance!
--Larry Sanger 13:15, 5 February 2007 (CST)
- Consider this one of my many test cases I'll be bringing over in the coming days, Larry. I'm hoping we can handle things sanely. --Jeff Raymond 13:23, 5 February 2007 (CST)