Talk:Jesus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas E Kelly (anyone else think the history of jesus according to the gospels is important for this article?) |
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This one has gone from bad to worse - so far. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 21:53, 16 January 2007 (CST) | :This one has gone from bad to worse - so far. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 21:53, 16 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::will the history of jesus according to the Christian gospels still be included in the final product? | |||
::will the history of jesus according to the Christian gospels still be included in the final product? [comment added on 19 January 2007 by [[User:Thomas E Kelly]] ] | |||
::Feel free to join in... I had assumed that each of the gospels would have its own article. How much time do we have, anyway? [[User:Bei Dawei|Bei Dawei]] | ::Feel free to join in... I had assumed that each of the gospels would have its own article. How much time do we have, anyway? [[User:Bei Dawei|Bei Dawei]] | ||
:::I don't think there really is a time limit. It's going to be a long time before CZ has a ton of articles so just work hard on a few articles that you are passionate about. The reason I liked the history according to the gospel is because a lot of people won't actually go to the gospel subpages but will read this article. I think it's important anyone else? [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 14:00, 19 January 2007 (CST) | :::I don't think there really is a time limit. It's going to be a long time before CZ has a ton of articles so just work hard on a few articles that you are passionate about. The reason I liked the history according to the gospel is because a lot of people won't actually go to the gospel subpages but will read this article. I think it's important anyone else? [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 14:00, 19 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::::Yes, I think it is absolutely important. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 19:47, 19 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 20:47, 19 January 2007
Major changes. I look forward to reading the final product. It will be important to analyze the changes after this major reworking is complete. Happy writing and best of luck on this huge article! -Tom Kelly (Talk) 00:58, 15 January 2007 (CST)
- This one has gone from bad to worse - so far. Stephen Ewen 21:53, 16 January 2007 (CST)
- will the history of jesus according to the Christian gospels still be included in the final product? [comment added on 19 January 2007 by User:Thomas E Kelly ]
- Feel free to join in... I had assumed that each of the gospels would have its own article. How much time do we have, anyway? Bei Dawei
- I don't think there really is a time limit. It's going to be a long time before CZ has a ton of articles so just work hard on a few articles that you are passionate about. The reason I liked the history according to the gospel is because a lot of people won't actually go to the gospel subpages but will read this article. I think it's important anyone else? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 14:00, 19 January 2007 (CST)
- Feel free to join in... I had assumed that each of the gospels would have its own article. How much time do we have, anyway? Bei Dawei
- Yes, I think it is absolutely important. Stephen Ewen 19:47, 19 January 2007 (CST)