Intelligent design: Revision history

25 May 2007

• curprev 19:2319:23, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 28,085 bytes −62‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:2119:21, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 28,147 bytes −403‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:1719:17, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 28,550 bytes +1,213‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:1619:16, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 28,541 bytes +1,204‎ →‎Problems with assuming genetic mechanisms cannot produce intelligent design
• curprev 19:1519:15, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 28,538 bytes +1,201‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducible complexity
• curprev 18:5518:55, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 27,337 bytes +1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:5418:54, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 27,336 bytes +703‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:4718:47, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Yi Zhe Wu‎ 26,637 bytes 0‎ linking
• curprev 18:4718:47, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Yi Zhe Wu‎ 26,637 bytes +4‎ separation of link
• curprev 18:3218:32, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Yi Zhe Wu‎ 26,633 bytes +14‎ doctrine
• curprev 17:4917:49, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 26,619 bytes −82‎ removed redundant second paragraph, did other editing. The writing of these first crucial paragraphs has once again become very clunky
• curprev 17:0617:06, 25 May 2007‎ imported>David Tribe‎ 26,866 bytes +165‎ Scienticically innaprpriate to personalise this issue - discusss the evidence not the people
• curprev 16:3016:30, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 26,701 bytes +1,022‎ →‎Criticisms of intelligent design: Who says that ID is not open to test?
• curprev 16:2816:28, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 26,437 bytes +767‎ →‎Peer reviewed ID publications: The two sides on this
• curprev 16:2516:25, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Ed Poor‎ 26,138 bytes +468‎ shoddy, probably should start over
• curprev 10:3510:35, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 25,675 bytes +5‎ Call it a doctrine?
• curprev 10:0810:08, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 25,670 bytes −9‎ →‎Prominent modern intelligent design thinkers: "proponent" better than "thinker"
• curprev 10:0710:07, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Will Nesbitt‎ 25,679 bytes +9,335‎ →‎The theorists of intelligent design: eliminated "theorists" and implications of article "the"
• curprev 08:1808:18, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,719 bytes +204‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducible complexity
• curprev 08:0208:02, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,515 bytes +27‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducible complexity
• curprev 08:0108:01, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,488 bytes −25‎ →‎Criticisms of intelligent design
• curprev 08:0008:00, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,513 bytes −46‎ →‎Criticisms of intelligent design
• curprev 07:5607:56, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,559 bytes −3‎ →‎The proponents of intelligent design: change to theorist
• curprev 06:4906:49, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ 25,562 bytes +214‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 06:4206:42, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Larry Sanger‎ m 25,348 bytes +1,167‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducibile complexity: typo
• curprev 06:4106:41, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,349 bytes −108‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducibile complexity
• curprev 06:3806:38, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,348 bytes +1‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 06:3806:38, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ m 25,348 bytes +1‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 06:1006:10, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,347 bytes −110‎ moved from lead, see Talk
• curprev 06:0506:05, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ m 25,458 bytes +1‎ →‎Problems with the logic and assumptions of irreducibility complex
• curprev 05:5405:54, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 25,457 bytes +1,276‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 05:4405:44, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Will Nesbitt‎ 24,518 bytes +337‎ →‎Irreducible Complexity
• curprev 05:4105:41, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 24,179 bytes −2‎ →‎Criticisms of intelligent design
• curprev 05:2805:28, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Will Nesbitt‎ m 24,181 bytes +973‎ →‎The proponents of intelligent design
• curprev 05:2805:28, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Will Nesbitt‎ 24,181 bytes +973‎ →‎The proponents of intelligent design
• curprev 05:1605:16, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 24,147 bytes +939‎ →‎Could the flagellum have evolved by natural selection?
• curprev 05:0605:06, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 24,010 bytes +802‎ →‎Criticisms of intelligent design
• curprev 04:2804:28, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 23,208 bytes +166‎ →‎Could the flagellum have evolved by natural selection?
• curprev 04:2604:26, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ m 23,042 bytes +1‎ →‎Could the flagellum have evolved by natural selection?
• curprev 04:2104:21, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ m 23,041 bytes +4‎ →‎The proponents of intelligent design
• curprev 04:0104:01, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 23,037 bytes −33‎ →‎The proponents of intelligent design
• curprev 02:0902:09, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 23,070 bytes +794‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 01:5001:50, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 22,276 bytes +100‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 01:4701:47, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 22,176 bytes +89‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 01:4401:44, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 22,087 bytes −2‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 01:4201:42, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 22,089 bytes +368‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design
• curprev 01:4001:40, 25 May 2007‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 22,025 bytes +304‎ →‎An Argument for Intelligent Design

24 May 2007

• curprev 16:4716:47, 24 May 2007‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 21,950 bytes −7‎ I don't think we want two "are best explained by" in the two opening sentences; it's sort of weasel wording, in any case; I have revised the second use
• curprev 16:4416:44, 24 May 2007‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 21,957 bytes +10‎ if I understand ID correctly, it is saying that the *origins* of "living organisms" are a result of ID; I have therefore put "origins" into the second paragraph
• curprev 16:1916:19, 24 May 2007‎ imported>Nathan Lee‎ 21,947 bytes +226‎ →‎Irreducible Complexity